期刊文献+

唐至明清时期礼法关系的互动——以“杀人移乡”和“亲属为人杀私和”为例

The Interaction Between LI and Law from Tang to Ming and Qing Dynasty——Taking Legal Provisions of ″Killing People and Moving Township″ and ″Privately Compromising when Relatives Are Killed″ for Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《唐律疏议》中的"杀人移乡"条与"亲属为人杀私和"条从不同角度体现了封建国家对待复仇行为态度。"杀人移乡"条文的历史沿革展现了随着社会的发展,封建国家对社会控制能力的增强以及法制力量的递进,而"亲属为人杀私和"条文代表的是"亲亲尊尊"的礼制原则,其在封建社会一如既往地被贯彻执行,体现了"礼"的基础地位。两个条文不同的"命运",从某种程度上体现了封建社会"礼"与"法"的互动。 The attitude of feudal state to revenge is reflected from two legal provisions "killing people and moving township" and "privately compromising when relatives are killed" in Tang Code. The evolution of "killing people and moving township" shows that the feudal country controls the society more and more closely and the progress of law with the development of China. "Privately compromising when relatives are killed" stands for "Qin Qin and Zun Zun". It was carried out in Chinese feudal society and reflected the fundamental position of "Li". The destinies of the two legal provisions are different. It reflects the interac- tion of "Li" and "Law".
作者 张洁
出处 《安徽电气工程职业技术学院学报》 2012年第2期52-57,共6页 Journal of Anhui Electrical Engineering Professional Technique College
关键词 杀人移乡 迁徙 亲属为人杀私和 互动关系 "killing people and moving township" migration "privately compromising when relatives arekilled" interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1.《东观汉记》[M].,..
  • 2《魏志》二十四.《韩暨传》.
  • 3《南史》七十四,《孝义列传》,《张景仁传》.
  • 4《隋书》八十,《列女传》,孝女王舜.
  • 5《明史》二九七,《孝义》六,《何竞传》.
  • 6瞿同祖.中国法律与中国社会[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
  • 7.《孟子·尽心上》[M].,..
  • 8《周礼·地官·司徒》.
  • 9[梁]沈约撰:《宋书》[Z].北京:中华书局,1999:1022,1374.
  • 10刘俊文.唐律疏议集笺[M].北京:中华书局,1996:1318,1288.

共引文献349

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部