凯恩斯主义与马克思主义危机成因的理论差异与启示

The Theoretic Difference in Explaining Causes of Crisis between Keynesian Economics and Marxism and its Implications

在经济过剩危机理论上，凯恩斯主义分析的经济学基础是主观唯心主义， 其分析视野具有明显的封闭性，其分析的聚焦点是市场，其理论重视反危机政策和措施 研究；马克思主义则是历史唯物主义，高度重视生产领域，从市场机制和市场制度相结 合的角度分析，并不着重研究反危机的政策和措施。马克思主义对我国市场化改革中出 现经济过剩问题的研究，更具有方法论上的指导意义。

Among the theories regarding economic surplus crisis, Keynesian Economics, which has subjective idealism as its economic philosophy basis and has a distinctly closed analysis field of vision, focuses on the market, and stresses the research of anti-crisis policies and measures. In contrast, Marxism, which is historical materialism, attaches great importance to production field, combines market mechanism and market system in the analysis, but not focuses on the study of anti-crisis policies and measures. Thus, Marxism possesses more guiding implications in terms of methodology for the research of the economic surplus problem occurring in China's market-orientated reforms.