摘要
目的比较高频振荡通气与常频通气在新生儿胎粪吸入综合征(MAS)所致呼吸衰竭治疗中的效果。方法回顾性复习新生儿重症监护室收治MAS所致呼吸衰竭患儿58例。A组为高频振荡通气组(HFOV,n=28),B组同步间歇指令机械通气+容量目标组(SIMV+VG,n=30),比较两组治疗前后各时点(0 h、6 h、24 h、48 h)氧合指数(OI)、动脉/肺泡氧分压比值(a/APO2)的变化、治疗过程中并发症(肺气漏、BPD、脑出血)发生率及病死率;同时比较两组患儿氧暴露及机械通气时间。结果在机械通气6 h、24 h及48 h时间位点,两组OI和a/APO2比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),与同组0 h相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);HFOV组肺气漏、BPD、脑出血发生率、病死率、氧暴露及机械通气时间与SIMV+VG组相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与SIMV+VG机械通气模式相比,HFOV治疗新生儿胎粪吸入综合征所致呼吸衰竭疗效无明显差异,患儿未能获益。
Objective To study the value of high frepuency oscillatory ventilation therapy for respiratory failure induced by neonatal meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) by comparing with conventional mechanical ventilation. Methods Fifty-eight neonates with respiratory failure induced by MAS admitted consecutively to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) were respectively studied.They were assigned into Group A (HFOV, n = 28) and Group B(SIMV+VG, n = 30), OI and a/APO: were monitored at 0 h,6 h,24 h,48 h after mechanical ventilation, incidences of lung air leak, broncho-pulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventicular hemorrhage (IVH), mortality and ventilation time, oxygen exposure time were compared. Results There were no differences in OI and a/APO2 at 6 h, 24 h and 48 h after ventilation between the two groups (P 〉 0.05) ;but compared with 0 h, OI and a/APO2at 6 h, 24 h and 48 h all had difference (P〈 0.05). At the same time, compared with the SIMV+VG group, the HFOV group showed similar incidences of lung air leak, BPD, IVH and mortality (P 〉 0.05), and had not shorten the ventilation time, oxygen exposure time (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of HFOV therapy for respiratory failure induced by neonatal MAS appears to be similar to SIMV+VG therapy, suggesting that HFOV therapy fails to be beneficial for MAS.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2012年第19期45-47,共3页
China Modern Doctor
关键词
高频振荡通气
同步间歇指令通气
容量目标通气
胎粪吸入综合征
新生儿
High frequency oscillatory ventilation(HFOV)
Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV)
Vol-ume targeted ventilation (VG)
Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS)
Neonatal