期刊文献+

融入自动评价系统的英语写作实验教学对高校英语教师的影响研究 被引量:42

Impact of Integrating an Automated Assessment Tool into English Writing on University Teachers
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究通过一项为期一学年、将基于现代信息技术的自动评价工具运用于写作教学的实验,探讨写作教学和教师的变化。研究表明,写作教学从关注语言错误转化为关注内容的挖掘和表达,从关注写作结果转化为关注写作过程。教师的教学理念、行为、角色均发生了变化。评价工具的运用诱发了教学变革,然而,成就教学变革的基本力量是教师、教师学习以及教师对评价工具的把握。 The study investigated how the one-year experimental teaching that had integrated an automated writing assessment tool into English writing has impacted on the teachers and their teaching. Data were collected from open- ended questionnaires, interviews, and journals. It was revealed that the teaching focus has shifted from attending to language forms to content exploration and expression, from the learners' writing product to their writing process and pedagogy. Teachers' beliefs in teaching writing, their practices, and roles have also changed. The assessment tool acted like a catalyst for reform. The main force of the changes, however, was the teachers, their learning, and their effective integration of the tool into their teaching of writing.
机构地区 北京外国语大学
出处 《外语电化教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期3-10,共8页 Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题"基于现代信息技术的形成性评价工具的应用研究"(GFA097005)的资助
关键词 写作自动评价系统 英语写作 英语教学 Automated Writing Assessment System English Writing English Teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Attali, Y. Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion [ R ]. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), San Die- go, CA,2004.
  • 2Chen, E. & Cheng, E. Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes [ J ]. Language Learning &Technology,2008,12 ( 2 ).
  • 3Ellis, R. Corrective feedback in theory, research and prac- tice[ R]. Keynote speech presented at the Fifth International Symposium of ELT in China. Beijing, China,2007.
  • 4Gibbs, G & Simpson, C. Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning [ J ]. Learning and Teaching in Hi~her Education, 2004,1 ( 1 ).
  • 5Grimes, D. & Warschauer, M. Utility in a fallible tool: a multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation [ J ]. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2010,8 (6).
  • 6Kling, R. What is social informatics and why does it matter? [OL/J]. D-Lib Magazine, 1999, 5 ( 1 ) at http://www.dlib. org : 80/dlib/january99/kling/O1 kling, html ( accessedon May 28h ,2012).
  • 7Landauer, T. K. , Laham, D . & Fohz, P. Automated sco- ring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay As- sessor [A]. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (eds.) , Au- tomated Essay Scoring : A Cross-disciplinary Perspective [ C ]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum,2003.
  • 8Page, E. Project essay grade: PEG[ A]. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein ( eds. ), Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross- disciplinary Perspective [ C]. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erl- baum Associates, 2003.
  • 9Rich, Changhua Sun, Harrington, H. , Kim. , J. & West, B. Automated essay scoring in state formative and summativewriting assessment[ R]. Paper presented at AERA New York City, March 24,2008.
  • 10Tang, Jinlan & Rich, Changhua Sun. Online Technology- Enhanced English Language Writing Assessment in the Chi- nese Classroom[ R]. Paper presented at 2011 Annual con- ference of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 8-12, USA ,2011.

二级参考文献112

共引文献502

同被引文献399

二级引证文献234

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部