期刊文献+

述情障碍青少年心理理论能力的研究 被引量:12

Theory of mind impairment in youngsters affected by alexithymia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过对青少年述情障碍者心理理论能力的研究,从冷、热心理理论和一、二级推理能力不同角度揭示述情障碍者心理理论能力损害的状况。方法使用Yoni测验中文版和一系列背景测验,比较31名述情障碍者和30名正常对照被试的心理理论能力。结果述情障碍组热心理理论正确得分[(35.81±6.30)分]与正常对照组的正确得分[(39.83±6.02)分]比较,差异有统计学意义(t=-2.55,P〈0.05)。主要表现在二级热心理理论的正确得分[(24.55±6.01)分]明显低于正常对照组[(28.30±6.04)分],差异有统计学意义(t=-2.76,P〈0.01)。而述情障碍组冷心理理论的正确得分[(19.00±2.11)分]与正常对照组[(19.43±2.13)分]比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.80,P〉0.05)。结论述情障碍者热心理理论能力存在着缺陷,缺陷主要体现在二级推理能力。 Objective To study theolT of mind(TOM) of youngsters in alexithymia, and to assess the impairment in TOM by analysing affective and cognitive TOM and the first and second order judgment. Methods TOM of 31 alexithymics and 30 healthy control subjects get be examined by the Chinese version of "Yoni task" and series of tests. Results There were significant differences in affective TOM accuracy scores between alexithymics and healthy controls ( ( 35.81 ± 6.30) vs (39.83 ± 6.02), t = - 2.55, P 〈 0.05 ). Particularly, alexithymics got significantly lower accuracy scores in the second order judgement of affective TOM ( (24.35 ± 6.01 ) vs ( 28.80 ±6.04 ) , t = - 2.76, P 〈 0.01 ). However, there were no in cognitive TOM accuracy score..s be- tween alexithymics and health controls ( ( 19.00 ±2.11 ) vs ( 19.43 ± 2. 13 ), t = - 0.80, P 〉 0.05 ). Conclu- sion Alexithymics are impaired in affective TOM, specially the second order judgement.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第7期605-607,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(31100812) 国际科技合作计划项目(10080703040) 安徽医科大学校基金(2010xkj005)
关键词 述情障碍 心理理论 一级推理 二级推理 Alexithymia Theory of mind First order judgment Second order judgment
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Premaek D ,Woodruff G. Chimpanzee problemsolving: a test for eom-pre- hension. Science, 1978,202:532-535.
  • 2Frawley W,Smith RN. A processing theory of alexithymia. Cogn Syst Res ,2001,2 : 189-206.
  • 3杨利芹,汪凯,朱春燕,张玉凤,吕心怡,曹慧,常荷.自闭症儿童与正常儿童父母的心理理论能力比较[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2011,20(9):812-814. 被引量:5
  • 4凌宇,蚁金瑶,章晨晨,钟斌,姚树桥.少儿述情障碍问卷中文版的信、效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2009,23(4):294-298. 被引量:13
  • 5Taylor GJ, Bagby RM, Parker JDA. Disorder of affect reguation : Alex- ithymia in medical and psychiatric illness. Cambridge:Cambridge U- niversity Press, 1997.
  • 6宫火良,郑希付.高述情障碍者的信息选择特征[J].心理科学,2010,33(3):593-595. 被引量:12
  • 7张春雨,张进辅,张静秋,张苹平.述情障碍成因的认知及社会机制[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(3):398-409. 被引量:60
  • 8Wastell CA, Taylor AJ. Alexithymic mentalising: Theory of mind and social adaptation. Soc Behav Pers,2002,30:141-148.
  • 9Brothers L, Ring B. A neuroethologica] framework for the representa- tion of minds. J Cogn Neurosci, 1992,4 : 107-118.
  • 10Moriguchi Y, Ohnishi T, Decety J, et al. The human mirror neuron system in a population with deficierLt self-awareness : an fMRI study in alexithymia. Hum Brain Mapp,2009,30:2063-2076.

二级参考文献105

共引文献92

同被引文献144

引证文献12

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部