期刊文献+

GP句重新分析难度与加工机制 被引量:2

A Review of the Difficulties and Parsing Mechanism of Reanalysis in Garden-path Sentence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 GP句是语言处理过程中一种特殊的临时歧义现象。初期加工失败后大脑启动重新分析机制。考察了重新分析过程及其限制因素的相关研究,发现解歧线索类型、加工倾向性、出错信号词与短语中心语之间的距离以及处于歧义域的动词特征等影响重新分析难度,进而制约GP句解歧效果和修复程度,同时对GP句重新分析内在机制研究进行了评述。 Reanalysis in garden-path sentence is an all-or-none phenomenon. This paper makes a review of the related studies of mechanism and limitations of reanalysis to find out to what extent and in what way reanalysis motivates the mechanisms to detect errors, deduce useful information about the nature of the necessary repair from those errors and ultimately create a successful parse.
作者 黄洁
出处 《天津外国语大学学报》 2012年第4期9-17,共9页 Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University
关键词 花园路径句 重新分析 加工难度 加工机制 garden-path sentence reanalysis parsing difficulties parsing mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Christianson, K. Sensitivity to Syntactic Changes in Garden Path [J]. Psycholinguist Research, 2008,(37): 391-403.
  • 2Christianson, K. et al. Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger [J]. Cognitive Psycholog, 2001, (42): 368-407.
  • 3Christianson, K. et al. Misinterpretations of Garden-path Sentences by Older and Younger Adults [J]. Discourse Processes, 2006, (42): 205-238.
  • 4Ferreira, F. & J. M. Henderson. Syntactic Reanalysis, Thematic Processing, and Sentence Comprehension [A]. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (eds.) Reanalysis in Sentence Processing Conference [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998. 73-100.
  • 5Ferreira, F., K. Christianson & A. Hollingworth. Misinterpretations of Garden-path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2001,(30): 1-20.
  • 6Ferreira, F., K. G D. Bailey & V. Ferraro. Good-enough Representations in Language Comprehension [J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002, (11): 11-15.
  • 7Ferreira, F. & K. McClure. Parsing of Garden-path Sentences with Reciprocal Verbs [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1997, (12): 273-306.
  • 8Fodor, J. D. & A. Inoue. Attach Anyway [A]. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (eds.) Reanalysis in Sentence Processing [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998. 101-141.
  • 9Frazier, L. & C. Clifton Jr. Construal: Overview, Motivation, and some New Evidence [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1997,(26): 278-294.
  • 10Frazier, L. & C. Clifton Jr. Sentence Reanalysis and Visibility [A]. In Fodor, J. D. & E Ferreira (eds.) Reanalysis in Sentence Processing [C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998. 143-176.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Christianson,K.,et al.Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger[J].Cognitive Psychology,2001,42:368-407.
  • 2Ferreira,F.& K.McClure.Parsing of garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs[J].Language and Cognitive Processes,1997,12(2/3):273-306.
  • 3Ferreira,F.,K.Christianson & A.Hollingworth.Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences:Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis[J].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2001,30(1):1-20.
  • 4Fodor,J.D.& A.Inoue.Attach anyway[A].In Fodor,J.D.& F.Ferreira(eds.).Reanalysis in Sentence Processing[C].Dordrecht:Kluwer,1998.101-141.
  • 5Ford,M.,J.Bresnan & R.Kaplan.A competence-based theory of syntactic closure[A].In Bresnan,J.(ed.).The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations[C].Cambridge,MA:MIT press,1982.727-796.
  • 6Frazier,L.& C.Jr.Clifton.Sentence reanalysis and visibility[A].In Fodor,J.D.& F.Ferreira (eds.).Reanalysis in Sentence Processing[C].Dordrecht:Kluwer,1998.143-176.
  • 7Gibson,E.& N.J.Pearlmutter.Distinguishing serial and parallel parsing[J].Journal of Psycholingnistic Research,2000,29(2):231-240.
  • 8Juliano,C.& M.K.Tanenhaus.A constraintbased lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference[J].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,1994,23:459-471.
  • 9Lewis,R.L.Falsifying serial and parallel parsing models:Empirical conundrums and an overlooked paradigm[J].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2000,29(2):241-248.
  • 10Meng,M.& M.Bader.Ungrammaticality detection and garden path strength:Evidence for serial parsing[J].Language and Cognitive Processes,2000,15:615-666.

共引文献6

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部