期刊文献+

非合作博弈两阶段生产系统的环境效率评价 被引量:24

Eco-efficiency evaluation of non-cooperative game two-stage production system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究了环境效率评价中广泛存在的一类典型问题:两阶段非合作博弈的效率评价问题,该问题有两个明显的特点:(1)决策单元由经济生产子系统和污染物处理子系统两个阶段的子系统构成,(2)经济生产子系统产生的污染物由污染物处理子系统进行处理,且经济生产子系统居于主导地位,而污染物处理子系统居于从属地位.文章在分析各个决策单元整体效率与其子系统效率之间关系的基础上,提出一种能够同时评价决策单元整体效率和其子系统效率的DEA方法;然后引入非合作博弈思想,提出了基于两阶段非合作博弈的环境效率评价的DEA方法;最后采用中国各地区的工业系统的环境效率评价的实例分析说明了该方法的合理性和有效性.由于文章提出的方法能够有效地分析决策单元内部子系统的有效性水平,能够反映子系统之间的主从关系,能够发掘影响决策单元效率的关键因素,因而能够给出更为有效的环境管理信息,为决策者的决策提供科学的依据. In practice, there exists a typical kind of eco-efficiency evaluation problem which has the following characteristics: (1) a decision-making unit (DMU) can be separated into two stages: the first stage is a pro- duction sub-unit and the second stage is a pollutant cleaning sub-unit; (2) in any DMU, the production sub- unit is the leader, and the undesirable outputs (pollutants) emitted by the production sub-unit are the internal inputs of the pollutant cleaning sub-unit. To solve this kind of problem, this paper firstly presents a DEA ap- proach which can evaluate a DMU' s efficiency and its sub-units' efficiencies simultaneously. Then, based on the idea of non-cooperative game, a game DEA approach is provided to deal with the proposed efficiency eval- uation problem. A case with real data set of regional industrial system in China is employed to illustrate the reasonability of the proposed method. Since the model can effectively analyze all internal sub-units' efficien- cies of a DMU with non-cooperative game components, and can find key factors for efficiency improvement, the developed approach can imply more veracious decision-making information for enviro^Lmental management.
作者 卞亦文
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第7期11-19,共9页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71101085) 上海市教委科研创新重点资助项目(12ZS099)
关键词 数据包络分析 非合作博弈 环境效率 两阶段 data envelopment analysis non-cooperative game eco-efficiency two-stage
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Desimone L D, Popoff F. Development WBCSD, Eco-efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development[ M]. Cam- bridge: MIT Press, MA, 2000.
  • 2Fare R, Grosskopf S, Lovell C A K, et al. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A non- parametric approach[ J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989, 71 : 90 -98.
  • 3王波,张群,王飞.考虑环境因素的企业DEA有效性分析[J].控制与决策,2002,17(1):24-28. 被引量:33
  • 4Seiford L M, Zhu J. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 142:16-20.
  • 5Fare R, Grosskopf S. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 157 : 242 - 245.
  • 6Lozano S, Guti6rrez E. Slacks-based measure of efficiency of airports with airplanes delays as undesirable outputs [J]. Com- puters & Operations Research, 2011, 38:131 -139.
  • 7Liang L, Li Y, Li S. Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the undesirable outputs and large dimen- sionality of data sets with PCA[ J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36:5895 -5899.
  • 8Fare R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach[J]. Economics Letters, 1996, 50:65 -70.
  • 9Lewis H, Sexton T. Network DEA : Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure [ J ]. Computers and Operations Research, 2004, 31 : 1365 - 1410.
  • 10Kao C, Hwang S N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan[ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185:418 -429.

二级参考文献56

  • 1段永瑞,田澎,张卫平.具有独立子系统的C^2GS^2-ISS模型及应用研究[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(2):31-37. 被引量:21
  • 2孟溦,张大群,刘佩华,彭子龙,张文引.对我院基础研究调查问卷的分析[J].中国科学院院刊,2005,20(4):312-317. 被引量:3
  • 3孟溦,刘文斌,李晓轩.DEA在定量科研评价中的应用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,26(9):11-16. 被引量:32
  • 4孟溦,黄敏,刘文斌.利用DEA对科研机构规模效益的分析[J].科研管理,2006,27(4):20-25. 被引量:18
  • 5魏权龄.评价相对有效性的EDA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1987..
  • 6Farrell M J. The measurement of production efficieney[J].Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 1957, 120(3) : 253 - 281.
  • 7Afriat S N. Efficiency estimation of production functions[J]. In ternational Economic Review, 1972, 13: 568 - 98.
  • 8Gharnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2:429 -444.
  • 9Chen Yao, Liang Liang, Yang Feng. A DEA game model approach to supply chain efficiency[J].Annals of Operations Research, 2006, 145(1) :5 - 13.
  • 10Liang Liang, Yang Feng, Cook W D, et al.DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2006. 145(1) :35 - 49.

共引文献95

同被引文献371

引证文献24

二级引证文献384

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部