期刊文献+

高铁运用安全的三大技术局限性 被引量:2

Three Technical Limits of High-Speed Railway Practice Safety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从当前高铁运用问题来看,高速转向架存在三大非线性,即拖车构架点头迟滞非线性、抗蛇行动态刚度非线性和非线性稳定性.在充分认识上述三大非线性的基础上,应用抗蛇行频带吸能新理论,提出了最佳安全稳定裕度调控技术对策,以进一步协调高铁运用安全性与经济性之间的矛盾.在"重返"350 km/h高铁运营的技术准备中,应当对如下三大技术局限性给予充分重视,即商业运营速度、振动疲劳和曲线横风,特别是曲线横风应当作为一项当前十分急迫的计算流体动力学CFD科研任务. From the viewpoint of the present problems in HSR practices, there exist three important nonlineari-ties in high-speed bogies, i. e. lag nonlinearity of trailer bogie frame pitching, anti-hunting dynamical stiffness nonlinearity and nonlinearity stability. Applied with the novel theory of anti-hunting absorption-band, the opti- mal strategy of safety stability margin regulation was proposed in the foundation of the above three nonlinearity findings in order to coordinate further the contradiction between safety and economics. The three following im-portant technical limits should be paid great attention in the technical preparation of returning 350 km/h HSR practices:commercial running velocity, vibration fatigue and the curve negotiation with crosswind, especially the curve negotiation with crosswind should be served as a very urgent researching mission of Computation Fluid Dynamics (CFD) at oresent.
出处 《大连交通大学学报》 CAS 2012年第4期5-11,共7页 Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University
基金 国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2009BAG12A01) 铁道部科技计划资助项目(2011J013-B) 西南交通大学开放课题资助项目(TPL1102)
关键词 高铁运用 商业运营速度 振动疲劳 侧风扰动 HSR practices commercial running velocity vibration fatigue crosswind disturbance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献95

  • 1KEVIN S, CURTIS U, RUSSELL W. The Effect of Hollow-Worn Wheels on Vehicle Stability in Straight Track [J]. Wear, 2005, 258 (7-8): 1100- 1108.
  • 2POLACH O. Applieation of Nonlinear Stability Analysis in Railway Vehicle Industry [C] //Proceeding of the Eu- romeeh 500 Colloquium: Non-Smooth Problems in Vehicle Systems Dynamics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010: 15- 27.
  • 3MAZZOLA L, ALFI S, BRAGHIN F, et al. Limit Wheel Profile for Hunting Instability of Railway Vehicles [C] // Proceeding of the Euromech 500 Colloquium: Non-Smooth Problems in Vehicle Systems Dynamics. Berlin:Springcr-Verlag, 2010: 41-52.
  • 4ALFI S, MAZZOLA L, BRUNI S. Effect of Motor Connection on the Critical Speed of High Speed Railway Vehi- cles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2008, 46 (Supplement): 201-214.
  • 5Mackrodt P A. Zum Luftwiderstand, yon Schienenfahrzeugen. DFVLR AVA IB. 251 80C 08. Goettingen, Ger:DFVLR, 1980.
  • 6Mackrodt P A, Steinheuer J, Stoffers G. Aerodynamisch optimale Kopfformen fiir Triebziigen, DFVLR IB 152 79 A 27. Coettingen, Ger: DFVLR, 1980.
  • 7Brockie N J, Baker C J. The aerodynamic drag of high speed trains. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1990, 34:273-290.
  • 8Baker C J, Wright N G, Johnson, Gaylard A P. Inland Surfance Transport LINK Scheme. Final Proj Pep, Univ Birmingham. Birmingham, UK, 1999.
  • 9Paradot N, Talcotte C, Willaime A, Guccia L, Bouhadana JL. Methodology for computing the flow around a high speed train for drag estimation and validation using wind tunnel experiments. In: Proc World Congr Railw Res, Tokyo.Tokyo: Railr Tech Res Inst (CD-Rom). 1999.
  • 10Schulte-Werning B, Matschke G, Williame A, Malfatti A, Mancini G, Pecorni M. High speed trains with bocie fairings: European research into reducing aerodynamic drag and noise. In: Proc World Congr Railw Res, Tokyo. Tokyo:Railr Tech Res Inst (CD-Rom), 1999.

共引文献62

同被引文献27

  • 1ALFI S, MAZZOLA L, BRUNI S. Effect of motor connection on the critical speed of high-speed railway vehicles [ J]. Vehicle Syst Dynamics, 2008, 46(S1 ) : 201-214.
  • 2ITO M. huprovenlent to the aerodynamic characteristics of Shinkansen rolling stock[ J ]. J Rail & Rapid Transit, 2000, 214(3) : 135-143.
  • 3ALF1 S, DIANA G, ROCCH1 D, et al. Train-bridge-wbad interaction of the Messina bridge [ C ]//13th Int Conf Wind Eng ( ICWE13 ) , Amsterdam, 2011.
  • 4MAZZOLA L, A1,FI S, BRAGHIN F, et al. Limit wheel profile tbr hunting instability of railway vehicles[ C ]//Proc Euromech 500 Colloquium : Non-smooth Problems Vehicle Systems Dynamics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008: 41-52.
  • 5CHARLES G, DIXON R, GOODALL R. Least square method applied to rail vehicle contact condition monitoring [ C ]//Proc 17th World Congress: Int Fed Autoumt Contr, Seoul, 2008.
  • 6GUGLIOTI'A A, SOMJ~ A, ARRUS P, et al. Simulation of rail dynamics at politechnoco of torino[ C]//12th Eur Adams Users' Conf, Marburg,1997.
  • 7GUGLIOTTA A, SOMA A, di MAURO S R. Dynamic simulation of a friction damped railway vehieele[ C ]//4th Adams Rail Users' Conf, Utrecht, 1999.
  • 8BRAGHIN F, BRUNI S, RESTA F. Active yaw damper for the imptvvement of railway vehicle stability and curving perfurmanees: simulations and experimental results[ J ]. Vehicle Syst Dynamics, 2006, 44( 11 ) : 857-869.
  • 9IWNICKI S. Handbook of+ railway vehicle dynamics[ M]. London: Taylor & Francis, 2006 : 16.
  • 10WICKENS A H. Fundame~ltals uf rail vehicle dynamics: guidance and stability[ M]. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2003.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部