期刊文献+

左心室射血分数在不同病理瓣膜手术中的临床意义 被引量:4

Clinical significance of left ventricular ejection fraction in different pathological valve surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨左心室射血分数(LVEF)在单纯二尖瓣狭窄、二尖瓣关闭不全、主动脉狭窄、主动脉瓣关闭不全瓣膜手术中的指导意义。方法自1993年1月至2004年12月北京安贞医院心外科共进行瓣膜手术5066例,其中单纯二尖瓣狭窄984例(47.7%),单纯二尖瓣关闭不全653例(31.7%),单纯主动脉瓣狭窄138例(6.7%),单纯主动脉瓣关闭不全288例(13.9%)。患者均在体外循环下行瓣膜置换术或瓣膜成形术。分析术前LVEF值对不同病理改变的患者住院病死率的影响,同时对手术前后LVEF值的变化进行比较。结果按照临床标准,以LVEF≥50%为正常,LVEF〈50%为减低。①单纯二尖瓣狭窄患者中,术前LVEF减低患者住院病死率为3.7%(4/109),LVEF正常患者为3.4%(30/875),两者比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);单纯二尖瓣关闭不全患者中,术前LVEF减低患者的住院病死率为12.0%(10/83),明显高于LVEF正常患者住院病死率[3.3%(19/570)](P〈0.01);单纯主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,LVEF减低患者的住院病死率为4.5%(1/22),LVEF正常患者住院病死率2.6%(3/116),差异无统计学意义(尸〉0.05);单纯主动脉瓣关闭不全患者LVEF减低患者的住院病死率为8.5%(5/59),明显高于LVEF正常患者[2.2%(5/229)](P〈0.C15)。②单纯二尖瓣狭窄患者中,术前LVEF正常者术后LVEF下降[(61±9)%比(64±7)%,P〈0.01];LVEF减低者术后LVEF升高[(56±11)%比(44±6)%,P〈0.01]。单纯二尖瓣关闭不全患者中,术前LVEF正常患者术后LVEF明显下降[(58±10)%比(64±7)%,P〈0.01]。单纯主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,术前LVEF减低者,术后LVEF明显升高[(57±13)%比(43±5)%,P〈0.01];术前LVEF正常者,术后LVEF下降[(60±12)%比(66±9)%,P〈0.01]。单纯主动脉关闭不全患者中,术前LVEF正常者,术后LVEF明显下降[(57±10)%比(62±7)%,P〈0.01]。结论LVEF在不同病理改变的瓣膜病中意义不同。单纯二尖瓣狭窄中LVEF不是敏感指标,其参考意义有限。单纯二尖瓣关闭不全中LYEF是重要的评估指标。二尖瓣关闭不全中,LVEF降至正常,则预示心功能严重受损,且已失代偿。在单纯主动脉瓣狭窄病变中,LVEF不是反映病变程度的最敏感指标,同时受心室壁张力影响,不能完全代表心肌功能的改变,临床上不应作为判断手术风险的主要指标。单纯主动脉瓣关闭不全中,LVEF可以真实反映左心室功能,且LVEF值的降低是心脏失代偿的表现,且对预后产生不利影响,因此应作为手术指征和判断预后重要的参考指标之一。 Objectives To determine the clinical significance of left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) in different pathological valve surgery. Methods All 984 consecutive patients with isolated mitral stenosis( MS), 653 patients with isolated mitral insufficiency (MI), 138 patients with isolated aortic stenosis (AS), and 288 patients with aortic insufficiency(AI) from 1993 to 2004 were evaluated. All of them underwent valve replacement or repair, and LVEF was detected preoperatively and postoperatively. Results (1)The hospital mortality of patients with preoperative LVEF 〈 50% was similar as that of patients with LVEF ≥ 50% in MS group [ 3.7% (4/109) vs 3.4% (30/875), P 〉0.05 ] and AS group[4.5% (1/22) vs 2.6% (3/116), P 〉 0.05 ]. The mortality of patients with preoperative LVEF 〈 50% was significantly higher than that of patients with LVEF ≥50% in MI group[ 12.0% ( 10/ 83)vs 3.3% (19/570), P〈0.01] and AI group [8.5% (5/59) vs 2.2% (5/229), P〈0.05]. (2)In MS group, after treatment, the LVEF of patients with preoperative LVEF ≥50% decreased [ (61 ±9)% vs(64 ±7)%, P 〈 0.01 ], and increased in patients with preoperative LVEF 〈 50% [ (56 ± 11 ) % vs (44 ± 6) %, P 〈 0.01 ]. In MI group, after treatment, the LVEF of patients with preoperative LVEF ≥ 50% decreased [ (58 ± 10) % vs ( 64 ± 7) %, P 〈 0.01 ]. In AS group, after treatment, the LVEF of patients with preoperative LVEF 〈 50% increased [ (57 ± 13)% vs(43 ± 5)%, P 〈 0.01 ] , and decreased in patients with preoperative LVEF ≥50% [ (60 ± 12)% vs(66 ± 9)%, P 〈 0.01 ]. In AI group, after treatment, the LVEF of patients with preoperative LVEF ≥ 50% decreased [ (57 ± 10 ) % vs ( 62 ± 7 ) %, P 〈 0.01 ]. Conclusions LVEF has different influence on hospital mortality in different pathological valve diseases in valve surgery. To MI and AI patients, LVEF is an important risk factor on hospital mortality, but in MS and AS patients, it is not a sensitive index.
出处 《中国医药》 2012年第8期921-924,共4页 China Medicine
关键词 左心室射血分数 瓣膜手术 病理改变 Left ventricular ejection fraction Valve surgery Pathological change
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Libby P, Bonow RO, Zipes DP, et al. Aortic stenosis. In Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 5th ed. Philadel- phia: Saunders, 1997:919-945.
  • 2Tomos MP, Olona M, Permanyer-Miralda G, et al. Clinical outcome of severe asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation: a long-term pro- spective follow-up study. Am Heart J, 1995,130 (2) :333-339.
  • 3白涛,孟旭,张兆光.4437例瓣膜置换术住院死亡危险因素分析及安贞风险评分系统建立[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2010(1):8-12. 被引量:13
  • 4王崇,韩林,张冠鑫,李白翎,徐志云.心脏瓣膜手术在院死亡风险预测模型及评分标准的建立[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2011,18(1):2-10. 被引量:14
  • 5Snyder RW 2nd,Langc RA, WiUard JE,et al. Frequency,cause and effect on operative outcome of depressed left veutricular ejection fractionin mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol, 1994,73 ( 1 ) :65-69.
  • 6Matsumura T, Ohtaki E,Tanaka K,et al. Eehocardiographic predic- tion of left ventfieular dysfunction after mitral valve repair for mitral- regurgitation as an indicator to decide the optimal timing of repair. J Am Coil Cardiol,2003,42(3 ) :458-463.
  • 7Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AT, Schaff HV, et al. Echocardiographic prediction of survival after surgical correction of organic mitral re- gurgitation. Circulation, 1994,90(2) :830-837.
  • 8O'Toole JD,Geiser EA,Reddy PS,et al. Effect of preoperative ejec- tion fraction on survival and hemodynamic improvement following aortic valve replacement. Circulation, 1978,58 (6) : 1175-1184.
  • 9Mailet JM, Le Besnerais P, Benvenuti C, et al. Outcome after valve replacement for severe aortic stcnosis associated with reduced leftventrlcu]ar ejection fraction. J Heart Valve Dis,2005,14 ( 6 ) : 760-765.
  • 10Chaliki HP, Mohty D, Avierinos JF, et al. Outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and markedly reduced left ventricular function. Circulation,2002, 106 (21) :2687-2693.

二级参考文献26

  • 1张宝仁,徐志云,邢建洲,邹良建,梅举,于伟勇,王志农,郝家骅.单纯二尖瓣置换术3416例疗效分析[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2005,21(4):196-198. 被引量:31
  • 2孟旭,白涛.5066例瓣膜手术的围术期临床回顾[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2007,23(1):11-13. 被引量:18
  • 3Edwards FH, Graeber GM. The theorem of bayes as a clinical research tool. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1987,165 : 127 - 130.
  • 4Clark RE. The Society of thoracic surgeons national database status report. Ann Thorac Surg, 1994,57:20 - 26.
  • 5Shahian DM, Blackstone EH, Edwards FH, et al. Cardiac surgery risk models: a position article. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004, 78: 1868 - 1877.
  • 6Geissler HI. Holzl P, Marohl S, et al. Risk stratification in heart surgery: comparison of six score systems. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2000,17:400 -406.
  • 7Clark RE. It is time for a national cardiothoracic surgical database. Ann Thorac Surg, 1989,48:755 - 756.
  • 8Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the Euro SCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999, 15: 816 -823.
  • 9Karthik S, Srinivasan AK, Grayson AD, et al. Limitations of additive Euro SCORE for measuring risk stratified mortality in combined coronary and valve surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2004, 26: 318 -322.
  • 10Jin RY, Grunkemeier GL. Providence health system cardiovascular study group. Additive vs. logistic risk models for cardiac surgery mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2005 ,28 :240 -243.

共引文献22

同被引文献30

  • 1何涛,曾和松,乐伟波,李小欢,陆再英.18例心肌致密化不全患者的临床特征[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(6):548-551. 被引量:17
  • 2Oechslin E, Jenni R. Left ventricular non-compaction re-visited :a distinct phenotype with genetic heterogeneity?[J]. Eur Heart J, 2011,32( 12) : 1446-1456.
  • 3Richardson P, Me Kenna W , Bristow M, et al. Report ofthe 1995 World Health Organization/International Societyand Federation of CardiologyTask Force on the Definitionand Classification of cardiomyopathies [ J ]. Circulation,1996,93(5) ;841-842.
  • 4Maron B J, Towbin J A, Thiene G,et al. Contemporarydefinitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies : anAmerican Heart AssociationScientific Statement from theCouncil on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Trans-plantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Re-search and Functional Genomics and Translational BiologyInterdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epide-miology and Prevention [ J]. Circulation,2006,113 ( 14):1807-1816.
  • 5Chin T K, Perloff J K, Williams R G, ei al. Isolatednoncompaction of left ventricular myocardium. A study ofeight cases[ J]. Circulation,1990,82(2) :507-513.
  • 6Stollberger C , Finsterer J. Left ventricular hypertrabecu-lation/noncompaction [ J ]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2004,17(1) :91-100.
  • 7Burke A, Mont E, Kutys R,et al. Left ventricular non-compaction :a pathological study of 14 cases [ J ]. HumPathol, 2005,36(4) :403411.
  • 8Lofiego C , Biagini E , Pasquale F, et al. Wide spectrumof presentation and variable outcomes of isolated left ven-tricular non-compaction[ J]. Heart,2007 ,93 (1) :65-71.
  • 9Murphy R T, Thaman R, Blanes J G, et al. Natural his-tory and familial characteristics of isolated left ventricularnon-compaction[ J]. Eur Heart J,2005 ,26(2) : 187-192.
  • 10Oechslin E N,Attenhofer Jost C H, Rojas J R, et al.Long-term follow-up of 34 adults with isolated left ventric-ular noncompaction: a distinctcardiomyopathy with poorprognosis [ J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000,36 (2) :493-500.

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部