期刊文献+

IgA肾病牛津病理分型适用性及其与临床关系的研究 被引量:1

The clinical applicability of Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy and its relationship with clinical manifestation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用IgA肾病牛津分型法的临床适用性及其与临床指标的关系。方法收集191例原发性IgA肾病患者肾活检前血肌酐(SCr),24h尿蛋白定量、平均动脉压(MAP)等临床资料;依据IgA肾病牛津分型定义对肾组织切片进行病理分型;对不同牛津分型间肾活检前SCr、MAP、尿蛋白定量进行比较;对随访时SCr〉129.9μmol/L的26例患者就临床有效性进行预后多因素Logistic回归分析。结果肾组织伴有S1、T1—2型的患者比S0、T0型者。肾活检前SCr水平高(P〈0.05)。24h尿蛋白定量在M、S、E分型间无统计学差异。MAP在伴有S1、T1—2型患者中高于S0、T0型患者(P〈0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析显示伴有T1—2是导致疗效不佳的独立危险因素。结论牛津分型实际应用仍有局限性;IgA肾病患者伴有T1-2是导致疗效不佳的独立危险因素。 Objective To investigate the clinical applicability of Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy and the relationship with clinical indicators. Methods Clinical and pathological data of 191 cases of primary IgA nephropathy, including serum creatinine(SCr), urinary protein excretion (UP), mean arterial pressure (MAP),were collected. Pathological classification was done on the renal biopsy specimens by Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy. The SCr,UP and MAP before renal biopsy among the different Oxford classifications were quantitatively compared. In 26 patients with SCr〉129. 9 μmol/L during the follow-up period, the clinical effectiveness was subjected to multi-factor logistic regression analysis. Results The SCr levels in IgA nephropathy patients with S1 and T1-2 were higher than those in SO and TO. There was no significant difference in UP among other sub-types. MAP level in patients with SI or T1-2 was higher than other typess; Multi-factor logistic regression analysis showed that existence of T1-2 lesion in the Oxford classification was an independent risk factor of poor curative effectiveness. Conclusions There is limitation of clinical application of the Oxford classification. IgA nephropathy with T1 2 lesion is an independent risk factor of poor curative effectivenes of IgA nephropathy.
出处 《临床肾脏病杂志》 2012年第7期306-309,共4页 Journal Of Clinical Nephrology
关键词 肾小球 肾炎 IGA 穿刺活检 病理学 临床 Glomerulonephritis, IgA Puncture biopsy Pathology, clinical
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Roberts IS, Cook HT, Troyanov S, et al. The Oxford classifica tion of IgA nephropathy: Pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. Kidney Int, 2009,76 : 546-556.
  • 2Cattran DC,Coppo R, Cook HT, et al. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: Rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification. Kidney Int, 20(}9,76 : 534-545.
  • 3Ma YC, Zuo L, Chen J H, et al. Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney dis- ease. J Am Soc Nephrot, 2(106,17 : 2937-2944.
  • 4王海燕,王梅.主译.慢性肾脏病及透析的lf缶床实践指南.人民卫生出版社,2003.13.
  • 5Lee SM, Rao VM, Franklin WA, et al. IgA nephropathy: Morpho- logic predictors of progressive renal disease. Hum Pathol, 1982,13:314-322.
  • 6Haas M. Histologic subclassification of IgA nephropathy: A clini- copathologic study of 244cases. Am J Kidney Dis, 1997,29 : 829- 842.
  • 7Jiang L, Liu G, Lv J, et al. Concise semiquantitiative histological scoring system for immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Nephrology (Carlton), 2009,14 : 597-605.
  • 8师素芳,张宏,邹万忠,王海燕.新型IgA肾病病理分型解读[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2010,26(7):489-492. 被引量:7
  • 9Yamamoto R, Imai E. A novel classification for IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int, 2009,76 : 477-480.
  • 10Ei KK, Hill GS, Karras A, et al. Focal segmental glomeruloscle- rosis plays a major role in the progression of IgA nephropathy. II. Light microscopic and clinical studies. Kidney Int, 2011,79.. 643-654.

二级参考文献28

  • 1蒋镭,吕继成,陈文芳,王素霞,邹万忠,刘刚,张宏,王海燕.IgA肾病简明半定量病理评分方法及其与预后的关系[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2007,23(5):278-282. 被引量:40
  • 2Zhou FD, Zhao MH, Zou WZ, of primary glomerular diseases et al. The changing spectrum within 15 years: a survey of 3331 patients in a single Chinese centre. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2009, 24: 870-876.
  • 3lee SM, VM Rao, WA Franklin, et al. IgA nephropathy: morphological predictors of progressive renal disease. Hum Pathol, 1982, 13: 314-322.
  • 4Haas M. Histologic subclassifieation of IgA nephropathy: a clinicalpathologic study of 244 cases. Am J Kidney Dis, 1997, 29: 829-842.
  • 5Shigematsu H. Histological grading and stageing of IgA nephropathy. Pathol Int, 1997, 47: 194-202.
  • 6Katafuchi R, Kiyoshi Y, Oh Y, et al. Glomerular score as a prognosticator in IgA nephropathy: its usefulness and limitation. Clin Nephrol, 1998, 49: 1-8.
  • 7Working Group of the International lgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification. Kidney Int, 2009, 76: 534-545.
  • 8Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. Kidney Int, 2009, 76: 546- 556.
  • 9Jiang L, Liu G, Lv J, et al. Concise semiquantitative histological scoring system for immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Nephrology (Carlton), 2009, 14: 597-605.
  • 10Haas M. Histologic subclassification of IgA nephropathy: a clinicopathologic study of 244 cases. Am J Kidney Dis, 1997, 29: 829-842.

共引文献19

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部