期刊文献+

美国与欧盟的碳减排方案分析及中国的应对策略 被引量:3

Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction Plans of US and EU & Coping Strategies of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国在全球的碳减排上将面临越来越大的压力。当前的碳减排方案,可以分为"以美国为代表的伞形国家集团"、"欧盟"、"七十七国集团加中国"三大集团。各个集团出台不同的碳减排方案。深入分析美国与欧盟的碳减排方案,有利于我国制定更为科学的碳减排方案。研究结果表明,尽管美国与欧盟的碳减排方案存在差异,但是可以发现它们的碳减排方案都是基于促进本国经济发展的考虑,都是一种国家利益的考量。因此,在未来的碳减排上,我国应该秉承将碳减排与经济发展挂钩的基本策略;此外,尚需要进行一些国际谈判的策略选择。 China would face more and more pressures on global carbon emission reduction. Now, there are three plans on carbon emission reduction, which are umbrella group represented by US, EU ,77 countries group and China. Based on analysis of the carbon emission reduction plans of US and EU, we can develop a more scientific program of carbon reduction for China. The results show that both of them are to develop their economy and protect their country' s benefit. In the future, on the one hand, China should integrate carbon emission reduction and economy, on the other hand, should develop some international negotiation strategies.
作者 王刚
出处 《地域研究与开发》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期142-145,160,共5页 Areal Research and Development
关键词 碳减排 应对策略 美国 欧盟 中国 carbon emission reduction coping strategies SU EU China
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献113

  • 1何建坤,刘滨,陈文颖.有关全球气候变化问题上的公平性分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(6):12-15. 被引量:46
  • 2陈文颖,吴宗鑫,何建坤.全球未来碳排放权“两个趋同”的分配方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):850-853. 被引量:96
  • 3Toufiq A.Siddiqi,罗天祥.亚洲化石燃料利用所产生的二氧化碳排放:总的看法[J].人类环境杂志,1996,25(4):228-231. 被引量:11
  • 4高广生.气候变化与碳排放权分配[J].气候变化研究进展,2006,2(6):301-305. 被引量:24
  • 5UNFCCC, Bali Action Plan, http ://unfccc. int/.
  • 6http ://unfccc. int/.
  • 7《京都议定书》文本.http://unfccc.int/.
  • 8Pan Jiahua " Fulfilling Basic Development Needs with Low Emissions-China' s Challenges and Opportunities for Building a Post-2012 Climate Regime, " in Taishi Sugiyama, ed., Governing Climate: The Struggle for a Global Framework beyond Kyoto, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), 2005, pp. 87-108.
  • 9IPCC, "Climate Change 2007 : Mitigation of Climate Change, " Contribution of Working Group Ⅲ to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007.
  • 10D. Bodansky, S. Chou and C. Jorge-Tresolini, "International Climate Efforts beyond 2012," Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Dec. 2004, http ://www. pewclimate, org/docUploads/2012 % 20new. pdf. Accessed on July 2, 2009.

共引文献365

同被引文献63

  • 1金书秦,马如霞.当前农业碳汇价值实现的主要途径和完善建议[J].环境保护,2023,51(3):25-29. 被引量:10
  • 2Kaya Y, Yokobori K. Environment, Energy and Economy: Strategies for Sustainability [M]. Delhi: Bookwell Publications, 1999.
  • 3Beinhocker E, Oppenheim J, et al. The Carbon Productivity Challenge: Curbing Climate Change and Sustaining Economic Growth [ EB ]. http ://www. Mckinsey. com/mgi/publications/Carbon-Productivity, june, 2008.
  • 4Grossman G M, Krueger A B. Environmental Impacts of A North American Free Trade Agreement [ J]. NBER Working Paper, 1991.
  • 5Selden T, Song D. Environmental Quality and Development: Is There A Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? [ J ]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994, 27 (2) : 147 - 162.
  • 6Galeotti M, Lanza A. Reassessing the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions: A Robustness Exercise [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 57 (4) : 152 - 163.
  • 7Agras J, Chapman D. A Dynamic Approach to Environment Kuznets Curve Hypothesis [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28(2):266-277.
  • 8Richmond A K, Kaufmann R K. Is There A Turning Point in the Relationship between Income and Energy Use and/or Carbon Emissions? [ J ] . Ecological Economics, 2006, 56 (2) : 176 - 189.
  • 9He J, Richard P. Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 in Canada [ R]. Cahier de recherche/Working Paper 09 - 13, 2009.
  • 10Inada K I. On the Stability of Growth Equilibria in Two-sectorModels [ J ]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1964,31 ( 2 ) : 127 - 142.

引证文献3

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部