中国区域高技术产业技术创新效率评价研究——基于客观加权的网络SBM模型被引量：15

The Research on Technological Innovation Efficiency of China's Regional High-tech Industries:Based on Objective Weighted NSBM Model

下载PDF

导出

摘要将高技术产业技术创新活动分解为技术研发过程和技术转化过程,通过构建网络SBM模型和Tobit模型,较全面的评价和分析了中国区域高技术产业技术创新活动。研究结果表明:现阶段中国高技术产业形成了以原始创新资源投入为主,集成创新和引进消化吸收再创新资源投入为辅的创新模式;技术创新活动的整体效率和两子过程效率都较低,存在明显的省际差异;相对于技术研发过程的低效而言,技术转化过程并不是导致技术创新活动效率低下的主要原因;大部分地区的高技术产业表现为两过程效率的双重低下或一高一低;区域经济实力、产业结构、政府对技术创新活动的支持力度对高技术产业技术创新效率具有显著的促进作用。 Technological innovation processes of High- tech industries are broken down into technological R＆D process and technological transformation process in this paper. Network SBM and Tobit models are utilized to evaluate and analyze the technological innovation efficiencies of the China＇s regional High-tech industries. The results indicate that High-tech industries have formed a pattern that the resources inputting original innovation are more than integrated innovation and the introduction of further absorption in China at the present stage. The technological innovation efficiencies are generally low, including the overall efficiency and the efficiencies of two sub-processes, and there exists significant interprovincial difference. The technological transformation process doesn＇t lead to the low efficiencies of technological innovation processes in China＇s High-tech industries. The efficiencies of two sub-processes of most regions show double inefficient or one high ＆ one low. Regional economic strength, industrial structure and government support show a significant improving effect on the technological innovation processes.

作者尹伟华

机构地区中国人民大学统计学院安徽财经大学统计与应用数学学院

出处《统计与信息论坛》 CSSCI 2012年第8期99-106,共8页 Journal of Statistics and Information

基金中国人民大学科学研究基金项目(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)<基于网络分析视角下的我国区域R&D投入绩效评价研究>(12XNH157)

关键词高技术产业技术创新地区差异网络SBM TOBIT模型 High-tech industry technological innovation regional difference network SBM tobit model

分类号 F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1朱有为,徐康宁.中国高技术产业研发效率的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(11):38-45. 被引量：613
2Zhang A, Zhang Y, Zhao tL A Study of the RD Efficiency and Productivity of Chinese Firms[J]. Journal of Compara- tive Economics, 2003, 31(3).
3Wang E C. RD Efficiency and Economic Performance: A Cross--country Analysis Using the Stochastic Frontier Approach[J]. Policy Modeling, 2007,29 (2).
4Fu X L, Yang Q G. Exploring the Cross-country Gap in Patenting: A Stochastic Frontier Approach[J]. Research Policy, 2009,38(7).
5韩晶.中国高技术产业创新效率研究——基于SFA方法的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2010,28(3):467-472. 被引量：206
6Sena V. Total Factor Productivity and the Spillover Hypothesis: Some New Evidence [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004,92 (1).
7Gaimon C, Morton A. Investment in Facility Changeover Flexibility for Early into High--tech Markets[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2005,14(2).
8Raab Raymond A, Pradeep Kotamraju. The Efficiency of the High--tech Economy: Conventional Development Indexes Versus A Performance Index[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2006,46(3).
9. Wang E C, Huang W. Relative Efficiency of RD Activities: A Cross--country Study Accounting for Environmental Factors in the DEA Approach[J]. Research Policy, 2007,36(2).
10Chen C J, Wu H L, Lin B W. Evaluating the Development of High-- tech Industries. Taiwan' s Science Park[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2006,73(4).