摘要
蒙古学与内蒙古方志关系密切。虽然内蒙古方志包含蒙古学部分内容,蒙古学包括内蒙古方志一些内容,但二者有区别。蒙古学的地域范围比内蒙古方志广泛。在内蒙古首轮修志工作中,对二者关系的认识不到位。在利用蒙古学资料方面存在着资料不翔实、不全面、没有时代特色、没有地域特点等问题。本文结合内蒙古首轮修志工作实践,在阐述蒙古学与内蒙古方志关系的基础上,探讨第二轮修志工作中如何正确把握二者的关系。
Mongolian studies are closely related with Inner Mongolian local records. Inner Mongolian local records contain part of the contents of Mongolian studies. The territorial scope of Mongolian studies is more extensive than Inner Mongolian local records. During first-round Inner Mongolian local records compilation,attention to the intertwining relationship between the two was not well paid. In terms of using Mongolian studies reference materials,there were problems of incomplete and inaccurate reference materials,incomprehensive,bearing no features of the times,and having no territorial characteristics. This article,in combination with first-round Inner Mongolian local records compilation practice,and on the basis of ex-pounding the relationship between Mongolian studies and Inner Mongolian local records,discusses how to deal with the relationship between the two during second-round local records compilation.
出处
《中国地方志》
CSSCI
2012年第7期58-60,5,共3页
China Local Records