期刊文献+

超早期肾动脉阻断技术在复杂性腹腔镜肾脏手术中的应用 被引量:4

Application of direct access to the renal artery in high-complexity laparoscopic nephrectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着腹腔镜技术的成熟和经验的积累,腹腔镜肾癌根治术已经成为局限性肾癌和部分局部进展性肾癌治疗的"金标准"。经腹腹腔镜肾癌根治术中采用经典或早期肾动脉阻断方法是不符合无瘤原则的,而采用超早肾动脉阻断方法(左侧经屈氏韧带从左肾动脉根部阻断、右侧经主动脉-下腔静脉间隙从右肾动脉根部阻断)能在尽少触碰瘤体的情况下完成肾动脉阻断,不仅最大程度地遵循了无瘤原则,而且在处理一些复杂性肾癌(如大肾癌、伴淋巴结转移、伴肾静脉癌栓、既往同侧肾手术史、外伤史、感染史、肾动脉变异等)也体现出明显优势。同时该方法还能扩展应用于其他比较复杂的肾(根治)切除手术中,如肾周严重侵犯的肾盂癌、巨大肾良性肿瘤、肾结核、感染性无功能肾等。超早期肾动脉阻断方法既遵循无瘤原则,又降低了复杂性腹腔镜肾脏手术的难度,值得临床推广。 As the laparoscopic technology developed and experience accumulated,laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has become the standard treatment of localized or partial locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.Classic or early ligature of renal artery violates Robson principle in varying degrees,but the technique of direct access to the renal artery,which is achieved at the level of the Treitz ligament on the left and interaortocaval space on the right,not only follows Robson principle best,but also has incomparable advantages on high-complexity and high risk renal cell carcinoma like large tumor,lymph node metastasis,prior surgery or infection of ipsilateral kidney,renal artery variation and renal vein thrombus.This technique also can be used in other renal disease like local advanced renal pelvic carcinoma,renal metastatic carcinoma,huge benign tumor,non-functioning kidney caused by nephrophthisis or renal infection.The technique should be popularized because it follows Robson principle and by which laparoscopic nephrectomy for high-complexity becomes easier.
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2012年第4期325-328,共4页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 肾动脉 腹腔镜 肾癌 肾脏 淋巴结清扫 renal artery laparoscopy renal cell carcinoma kidney lymph node dissection
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1JEONG W, RHA KH, KIM HH, et al. Comparison of laparo- scopic radical nephrectomy and open radical nephrectomy for pathologic stage T1 and T2 renal cell carcinoma with clear cell histologic features: a multi-institutional study [J].Urology, 2011,77(4) :819-824.
  • 2JEON SH, KWON TG, RHA KH, et al. Comparison of laparo- scopie versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a retrospective analysis of multi-center results[J]. BJU Int, 2011, 107(5) :817-821.
  • 3BENSALAH K, SALOMON L, LANG H, et al. Survival of patients with nonmetastatic pT3 renal tumours: a matched com- parison of laparoseopic vs open radical nephrectomy[J]. BJU Int, 2009,104(11):1714-1717.
  • 4ROBSON CJ, CHURCHILL BM, ANDERSON W. The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma[J]. J Urol, 1969,101(3) :297-301.
  • 5ROBSON CJ. Radical nephreetomy for renal cell carcinoma[J]. J Urol, 1963,89 : 37-42.
  • 6DUNN MD, MCDOUGALL EM, CLAYMAN RV. Laparo- scopic radical nephrectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2000, 14 ( 10), 849- 855 ;discussion 855-847.
  • 7PORPIGLIA F, RENARD J, BILLIA M, et al. Left laparo- scopic radical nephrectomy with direct access to the renal artery: technical advantages[J]. Eur Urol, Jun 2006,49(6) : 1004-1010.
  • 8PORPIGLIA F, TERRONE C, CRACCO C, et al. Direct access to the renal artery at the level of treitz ligament during left radi- cal laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy [J]. Eur Urol,2005,48(2) :291-295.
  • 9PORPIGLIA F, TERRONE C, CRACCO C, et al. Early liga- ture of renal artery during radical laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy: description of standard technique and direct access [J]. J Endourol, 2005,19(6) :623-626.
  • 10王林辉,盛海波,刘冰,杨庆,彭永涵,吴震杰,陈伟,徐遵礼,孙颖浩.超早期肾动脉阻断技术在经腹腹腔镜肾癌根治术中的安全性及可行性研究[J].第二军医大学学报,2011,32(9):934-937. 被引量:13

二级参考文献11

  • 1Ganpule A P, Sharma R, Thimmegowda M, Veeramani M, Desai M R. Laparoseopic radical nephrectomy versus open radical nephrectomy in T1-T3 renal tumors: an outcome analysis[J]. Indian J Urol,2008,24:39-43.
  • 2Hemal A K,Kumar A,Kumar R,Wadhwa P,Seth A,Gupta N P. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors; a long-term prospective comparison[J]. J Urol, 2007, 177:862 -866.
  • 3Matin S F,Gill I S,Worley S,Novick A C. Outcome of laparoscopic radical and open partial nephrectomy for the sporadic 4 em or less renal tumor with a normal contralateral kidney [J]. J Urol,2002,168(4 Pt 1):1356 1359.
  • 4Dunn M D, Portis A J, Shalhav A L, Elbahnasy A M, Heidorn C,McDougall E M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical ne phrectomy: a 9 year experience[J]. J Urol,2000, 164:1153- 1159.
  • 5Al Qudah H S,Rodriguez A R,Sexton W J. Laparoscopic management of kidney cancer: updated review[J].Cancer Control, 2007,14 : 218-230.
  • 6Dunn M D, McDougall E M, Clayman R V. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy[J]. J Endourol, 2000.14 : 849-855.
  • 7Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Cracco C, Renard J, Musso F, Grande S,et al. Direct access to the renal artery at the level of treitz ligament during left radical laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy[J].Eur Urol, 2005,48 :291- 295.
  • 8Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Cracco C, Cossu M, Grande S, Musso F, et al. Early ligature of renal artery during radical laparoscopic transperitoneal nephreetomy: description of standard technique and direct aceess[J].J Endourol, 2005,19:623-626.
  • 9Clayman R V, Kavoussi L R, Soper N J, Dierks S M, Meretyk S,Darcy M D,et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy~ initial case report [J].J Urol,1991,146:278- 282.
  • 10Colombo J R Jr,Haber G P,Jelovsek J E,Lane B,Novick A C, Gill I S. Seven years after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic and renal functional outcomes[J].Urology,2008,71: 1149-1154.

共引文献12

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部