摘要
《书目答问》与《四库全书总目》在体例、书目的选择与分类、著述思想等方面都存在很大不同,这些不同反映了同光时期的学术体系相对于乾嘉时期而言已经出现了某种突破和创新,具有十分明显的学术转型意义。透过《书目答问》与《四库全书总目》的比较,能够清晰把握中国传统学术现代转型的具体内涵。
There are great differences between 'Shu Mu Da Wen' and 'Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu' in aspects of format, classification and priciple of books. These differences reflect academic system of Tongguang period makes some breakthroughs and innovation compared with Qianjia, which has very obvious significance in academic transformation. Through this kind of comparison, we can grasp specific connotation of modern transformation of Chinese traditional academic clearly.
出处
《河南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第7期81-84,108,共4页
Henan Social Sciences
关键词
《书目答问》
《四库全书总目》
比较研究
学术转型
'Shu Mu Da Wen (Q & A about book list)'
'Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Lu'
Comparative Study
Academic transition