摘要
目的探讨并比较胃镜下负压吸引和留置胃管持续胃肠减压治疗胆囊炎并上腹痛的临床疗效及不良反应。方法将患者分为观察组和对照组,分别给予两种方法治疗,观察2组的临床疗效及不良反应。结果观察组的有效率高于对照组,外周血白细胞计数的下降程度大于对照组,不良反应发生率低于对照组。结论胃镜下负压吸引治疗胆囊炎并上腹痛具有止痛效果迅速,不良反应少等优点。
Objective To explore the comparison of curative effect and adverse reaction for holecystitis merger on abdominal pain with negative pressure under attrac gastroscope and Lien gastric tube decompression for stomach. Methods Divided the patients into the observation group and the control group,Were given two methods of treatment, Observe the clinical curative effect of two groups and adverse reaction. Results The observation group of efficient higher than those in the control group, peripheral blood of white blood cell count down to a greater extent than control group, adverse reaction rate lower than those of the control group. Conclusion The negative pressure under attrac gastroscope method has the analgesic effect quickly, fewer side effects, etc.
出处
《中国卫生产业》
2012年第17期9-9,11,共2页
China Health Industry
关键词
负压吸引
胃肠减压
胆囊炎
疗效
不良反应
The negative pressure attract
Gastrointestinal decompression
Cholecystitis
Curative effect
Adverse reactions