期刊文献+

胰岛素泵不同基础量分段法对2型糖尿病的疗效 被引量:17

Effect of setting the base amount of insulin pump on type 2 diabetes at different times
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较3种不同胰岛素泵基础量分段法对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的疗效优劣。方法:240例使用胰岛素泵治疗的2型糖尿病患者,分为3组,3段组、5段组和24段组各80例。观察3组治疗前后血糖值、血糖达标时间、胰岛素用量及低血糖发生率。结果:治疗前后3组血糖值均下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),3组治疗后血糖值比较差异无统计学意义。与3段组、5段组相比,24段组血糖达标所需时间少,胰岛素用量低,低血糖发生率低,但设置繁杂。5段组胰岛素用量与3段组相似,但达标时间短,低血糖发生率低(P<0.05),且设置简单、方便。结论:5段法设置简单、方便、疗效好。 Objective To observe the clinical effect and safety between three different parts of insulin pump base dose in treated patients with type 2 diabets mellitus. Methods 240 patients with type 2 diabets with insulin pump therapy were randomly divided into 3 groups: 3 parts group, 5 parts group and 24 parts group (80 cases in each group). The levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 hours postprandial glucose (2hPG), therapeutic time, insulin dose and the incidence of hypoglucemia were observsed. Results Three groups could decrease blood glucose efficiently (P 〈 0.01), and there were no significant difference in the level of glucose between three groups after treatment. Compared with 3 parts group and 5 parts group, therapeutic time, insulin dose and the incidence of hypoglucemia in 24 parts group were all decreased (P 〈 0.01). However, 24 parts were complicatedly setted up, and insulin dose in 5 parts group and 3 parts group were similar. But therapeutic time in 5 parts group was shorter than in 3 parts group. The incidence of hypoglucemia was lower than 3 parts group, and 5 parts were setted up simply. Condusion 5 parts group has the advantages of simple, convenience, and effective.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第15期2534-2536,共3页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 糖尿病 2型 胰岛素泵 3段法 5段法 24段法 Diabetes mellitus, type 2 Insulin pump 3 parts 5 parts 24 parts
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献54

共引文献98

同被引文献86

  • 1赵建林,郭献山,王林栋,陈玉凤,孔亚坤,耿秀琴.胰岛素强化治疗对初治2型糖尿病患者生活质量的影响[J].山东医药,2013,53(30):39-40. 被引量:9
  • 2Cummins E, Royle P, Snaith A, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost- effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabe- tes:systematic review and economic evaluation [ J ]. Health Technol Assess,2010,14( 11 ) :iii-iv, xi-xvi, 1 - 181.
  • 3Bohannon N, Bergenstal R, Cuddihy R, et al. Comparison of a novel insulin bolus-patch with pen/syringe injection to deliver mealtime insulin for efficacy, preference, and quality of life in adults with dia- betes : a randomized, crossover, multicenter study [ J ]. Diabetes Technol Ther,2011,13(10) : 1031 - 1037.
  • 4Deacon CF, Hoist JJ. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for the treat- ment of type 2 diabetes : comparison, efficacy and safety [ J ]. Expert Opin Pharmacother,2013,14 ( 15 ) :2047 - 2058.
  • 5Moser EG, Morris AA, Garg SK. Emerging diabetes therapies and technologies [ J ]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2012,97 ( 1 ) : 16 - 26.
  • 6Miao R, Wei W, Lin J, et al. Does device make any difference a real- world retrospective study of insulin treatment among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes[J]. J Diabetes Sci Technol,2014,8( 1 ) :150 - 158.
  • 7Yang WY,Lu JM,Weng JP,et al.Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China[J].N Engl J Med,2010,362(12):1090-1101.
  • 8Hu J,Gruber KJ,Hsueh KH.Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the SF-36 in older adults with diabetes in Beijing,China[J].Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2010,88(3):273-281.
  • 9YANG W Y, LU J M, WENG J P, et al. Prevalence of diabe- tes among men and women in China[J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2010,362(12) :1090- 1101.
  • 10WENG J P, LI Y B, XU W, et al. Ef{ect of inteasive iasulin therapy on beta-cell function and glycaemic control in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes a multicentre rando- raised parallel-group trial[J]. Lancet, 2008,371 (9626) : 1753- 1760.

引证文献17

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部