期刊文献+

主要排放部门的减排责任分担研究:基于全局成本有效的分析 被引量:7

Sharing the Burden of Mitigation among Key Emission Sectors in China: A Economy-wide Cost-effective the Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用中国能源与环境政策分析模型(CEEPA),从经济全局成本有效的角度,分析了一定减排约束下中国主要排放部门宜分担的减排责任及其减排行为。研究发现,基于排放量进行减排责任部门分担是有助于整体成本的,但对煤炭和运输仓储部门宜做出调整;随着减排目标的增加,应增添运输仓储部门的减排配额比例,减少煤炭部门的减排配额比例;短期内不宜对各部门尤其是煤炭部门设置较高的减排目标。 This study applies a CGE model for China's energy and environmental policy analysis (CEEPA) to analyze how the carbon mitigation burdens should be shared among key emission sectors in China, as well as how these sectors would behave to meet their burdens. This study finds that in general, allocating mitigation burdens based on historical emission could realize the national target in a cost-effective way. However, some adjustments should be made to coal and transportation sectors. The higher the national target, the burden shared by transportation sector should increase more while that shared by coal sector should increase less. The mitigation targets for all sectors, especially for coal sector, should not be set too high in the short term.
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第8期1239-1243,共5页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71020107026 70733005 71001007)
关键词 减排责任分担 部门减排行为 可计算一般均衡 mitigation burden sharing sectoral reduction behavior computable general equilibri-um
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1CAI W, WANG C, WANG K, et al. Scenario Anal- ysis on CO2 Emissions Reduction Potential in China's Electricity Sector[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35 (12) : 6 445~6 456.
  • 2LIAQUAT A M, KALAM M A, MASJUKI H H, et al. Potential Emissions Reduction in Road Transport Sector Using Biofuel in Developing Countries[J]. At mospheric Environment, 2010, 44(32):3 869~3 877.
  • 3GOLUB A, HERTEL T, LEE H L, et al. The Op- portunity Cost of Land Use and the Global Potential for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Agriculture and Forestry[J].Resource and Energy Economics, 2009, 31(4) : 299~319.
  • 4SHIMODA Y, YAMAGUCHI Y, OKAMURA T, et al. Prediction of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Poten- tial in Japanese Residential Sector by Residential En- ergy End-use Model[J]. Applied Energy, 2010, 87 (6) :1 944~1 952.
  • 5LI J. Towards a Low-carbon Future in China's Build ing Sector-A Review of Energy and Climate Models Forecast[J]. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(5): 1 736~ 1 747.
  • 6WANG K, WANG C, LU X, et al. Scenario Analysis on CO2 Emissions Reduction Potential in China's Iron and Steel Industry[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35 (4):2 320~2 335.
  • 7BASSI A M, BAER A E. Qaantifying Cross-sectoral Impacts of Investments in Climate Change Mitigation in Ecuador[J]. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2009, 13(2): 116~123.
  • 8ZHU B, ZHOU W, HU S, et al. CO2 Emissions and Reduction Potential in China' s Chemical Industry[J].Energy, 2010, 35(12):4 662-4 670.
  • 9CAI W, WANG C, CHEN J, et al. Comparison of COz Emission Scenarios and Mitigation Opportunities in China's Five Sectors in 2020[J]. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(3)..1 181~1 194.
  • 10魏一鸣,刘兰翠,范英,等.中国能源报告2008:碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:81-99.

共引文献4

同被引文献124

引证文献7

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部