期刊文献+

从“标记颠倒”看韵律和语法的象似关系 被引量:11

Markedness reversal:The iconicity of prosody and syntax in Chinese
原文传递
导出
摘要 在标记理论中,"标记颠倒"(markedness reversal)是指一个主范畴与它包含的一个次范畴在标记性上相反,背后的理据是某种关系的"象似"(iconicity)。汉语三音节的定中结构和述宾结构在与韵律结构(单双音节搭配[2+1]和[1+2])相匹配时存在着标记颠倒,这是因为汉语的动词是名词的一个次类,动性词语是名性词语的一个次类。在三音节定中结构里充当定语的名词和形容词在与韵律结构相匹配时也存在着标记颠倒,这是因为汉语的形容词是动词的一个次类因而也是名词的一个次类。这两个标记颠倒背后的理据是语言形式和意义之间的"松紧象似"和"多少象似",形式的松紧多少对应于意义的松紧多少。汉语"名含动,动含形"的词类模式与标记颠倒理论可以相互印证。从类型学的角度看,韵律是汉语的一种语法形态手段,首先用来区分摹状和非摹状,其次才对名、动、形做有限的区别。 Markedness reversal is defined in this paper as a reversal of a particular feature between a category and a subcategory under that category.In Mandarin Chinese the mono-vs.di-syllable distinction and the related [2+1] vs.[1+2] distinction in syllable alignment determines to a large degree the differentiation of two major syntactic relations,attributive-noun and verb-object.This kind of prosodic distinction is actually a morpho-syntactic means characteristic of the Chinese language which lacks inflectional morphology of the Indo-European languages.The fact is explained by markedness reversal,motivated by the iconicity of tightness and quantity between prosodic structures and syntactic relations,because in Chinese verbs constitute a subcategory in the noun category and adjectives a subcategory in the verb category.The related markedness reversal also sheds light on the characteristics of Chinese in its word class system.Typologically,in addition to the fact that Chinese adjectives behave more like verbs,more importantly,the primary distinction of word classes in Chinese is between depictives and non-depictives,the former includ~ing reduplicative forms of nouns,verbs and adjectives.
作者 陈刚 沈家煊
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期483-495,639,共13页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Beck, D. 2002. The Typology of Parts of Speech Systems: The Markedness of Adjectives[M]. New York, Routledge.
  • 2Comrie, B. 1981. The Language of the Soviet Union [M]. Cambridge: CUP. Croft, W. 2002.
  • 3Typology and Universals (2nd edition)[M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 4Dixon, R. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspective [A]. In R. Dixon&A. Aikh- envald (eds.). Adjective Classes: A Cross-linguistic Typology [C]. Oxford: OUP. 1-49.
  • 5Given, T. 2001. Syntax: An Introduction. Vol. I [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 6Greenberg, J. 1966a. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements [A]. In J. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Grammar (2nd edition) [C]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. 73-113.
  • 7Greenberg, J. 1966b. Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies [M]. The Hague: Mouton.
  • 8Hengeveld, K. 1992a. Non-verbal predictability [A]. In M. Kefer & J. van der Auwera ( eds. ) . Meaning and Grammar : Cross-linguistic Perspectives [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 77-94.
  • 9Hengeveld, K. 1992b. Parts of speech [A]. In M. Fortescue, P. Harder & L. Kristoffersen (eds.). Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 29-55.
  • 10Jakobson, R. 1932/1984. Structure of the Russian verb [A]. In L. Waugh & M. Halle (eds.). Russian and Slavic Grammar : Studies, 1931-1981 [C]. The Hague.. Mouton. 1-14.

二级参考文献110

共引文献866

同被引文献198

引证文献11

二级引证文献211

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部