摘要
在现在的全球化背景下,在社会科学和政治哲学领域中,我们见证了世界大同主义的复兴。从都市经验到政治方案,人们以不同的以至互不相联的方式描述了世界大同主义。从我们的起点来看,在布鲁塞尔,公民社会的行动者们用世界大同主义来修订卷入全球化的城市的民主需求。本文将把这个城市视作一种空间:世界大同主义,作为一种都市经验,可以由都市的市民社会来理解并理论化,进而成为其内在规范的政治观点的一部分。基于对布鲁塞尔市民行动的民族志学的实证分析法,我们分析了行动者们的运动。他们公然地追问、辩论及反思这个城市的世界性的特征,并从都市立场上形成了新的政治需求。通过考察在世界性的背景下,这些行动者明确表达的要求的方式,以及他们是否将其纳入自身实践中,我们将要考虑,至少是在欧洲首都(布鲁塞尔)目前定义的世界大同主义所固有的矛盾、局限和问题。因为布鲁塞尔同时也卷入了比利时的社群冲突。
In the current context of globalisation,we are witnessing a resurgence of references to cosmopolitanism,in both the social sciences and political philosophy. From urban experience to political projects,cosmopolitanism is interpreted in very different and often disconnected ways. Taking as our starting point the observation that,in Brussels,civil society actors use cosmopolitanism to reformulate the democratic needs of a city caught in the processes of globalisation,this article proposes to consider the city as a space in which cosmopolitanism,as urban experience,can be understood and theorised by urban civil society,and become part of its inherent normative political perspective. Based on an ethnography of citizens’ action in Brussels,an empirical analysis of this movement is undertaken,in which actors publicly question,debate,and reflect on the cosmopolitan nature of the city and make new political demands from an urban standpoint. By observing the way in which the requirements articulated by these actors in a cosmopolitan context are themselves adopted-or not-into their own practices,we shall consider the paradoxes,limits,and issues inherent in cosmopolitanism,at least as presently defined in Europe’s capital city of Brussels,which is also caught in Belgium’s communal conflicts.
出处
《国际社会科学杂志（中文版）》
2012年第2期60-71,6+10,共12页
International Social Science Journal（Chinese Edition）
