期刊文献+

慢性肾功能衰竭ICD-10编码质量调查分析 被引量:2

Analysis on Quality Investigation about Chronic Renal Failure ICD-10 Coding
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过调查我院慢性肾功能衰竭的ICD-10编码质量,提高我院ICD-10编码的准确性。方法根据慢性肾衰竭的临床分期,结合ICD-10编码规则,回顾性对我院2009年1月1日至2011年12月31日所有出院的慢性肾衰竭病例编码质量逐一调查分析。结果调查的慢性肾衰竭病例有495例,编码错误149例,误码率30.1%。错误编码原因由于出院诊断太笼统,编码人员对专科知识掌握不够,对慢性肾衰竭的临床分期不清楚,没有仔细查阅病案,只笼统地根据出院诊断编码,分类原则不熟练等原因。结论加强临床医师的国际疾病分类知识及诊断书写标准培训,提高编码人员的专业知识水平及加强责任心,方能提高ICD-10编码的准确性。 Objective Through investigating ICD-10 coding quality of chronic renal failure, it aims at improving the accuracy of ICD-10 coding. Methods According to clinical stages of chronic renal failure with combing ICD-10 coding principles, this paper had a retrospective analysis on coding quality of chronic renal failure discharged from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011. Results There are 495 cases of chronic renal failure in investi- gation, in which 149 cases have coding error whose rate of error coding is 30.1%. The reasons of wrong coding include too general discharged diagno- sis, inadequate professional knowledge, unclear about dinical stages and unskilled about classification principles of the coding-staffs, just giving coding according to discharged diagnosis without carefully reading medical records. Conclusions In order to improve the accuracy of ICD-10 coding, this paper suggests strengthening the classification knowledge and diagnosis writing standard training for clinical doctors and improving professional knowledge lev- el and responsibility of coding-staffs.
作者 张强 王湛涛
出处 《中国病案》 2012年第7期30-31,共2页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 慢性肾功能不全 国际疾病分类(ICD-10) 质量 分析 Chronic renal failure International classification of Diseases (ICD-10) Quality Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1黎福清,林洁中,史美玲.ICD-10疑点难点易混淆的疾病编码[J].中国病案,2008,9(5):35-36. 被引量:8
  • 2王淑梅,李继昌,主编.内科临床医师手册[M].河南医科大学出版社,1996.10.
  • 3北京协和医院世界卫生组织疾病分类合作中心编译.疾病和有关健康问题的国际统计分类,第十次修订本(ICD-10),第一卷,第三卷.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010年.

共引文献7

同被引文献34

引证文献2

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部