期刊文献+

儿童不同呼吸系统疾病气道反应性特点及其临床价值 被引量:10

Characteristics of airway responsiveness and clinical values of different respiratory diseases in children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨儿童支气管哮喘、咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)和支气管炎等不同呼吸系统疾病气道反应性特点及其临床价值。方法应用Astograph法气道反应性测定技术,对42例哮喘患儿、38例咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)患儿、36例支气管炎患儿及30例健康儿童进行气道反应性测定;分别对反映气道敏感性和气道反应性的Dmin、SGrs、PD35等各指标进行统计学分析和评估。结果哮喘组、CVA组和支气管炎组患儿的Dmin、SGrs、PD35等指标均低于健康对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),哮喘组、CVA组与支气管炎组患儿之间比较,差异也有统计学意义(P<0.05),而哮喘组与CVA组患儿比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论哮喘病、CVA和支气管炎等不同呼吸系统疾病患儿的气道反应性及气道敏感性均高于健康儿童,而不同呼吸系统疾病患儿的气道反应性、气道敏感性变化也各不相同,以此可为鉴别诊断提供依据。 Objective To investigate the characteristics of airway responsiveness and clinical values of asthma, cough variant asthma, bronchitis and other respiratory diseases in children. Methods Astograph was applied to measure airway responsiveness for 42 children with asthma, 38 children with cough variant asthma, 36 children with bronchitis and 30 healthy children. Indexes such as Dmin, SGrs and PD35 reflecting airway sensitivity and airway responsiveness were analyzed and assessed statistically. Results Dmin, SGrs, PD35 and other indicators of children in asthma group, CVA group and bronchitis group were lower than those in control group, the differences were statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). And asthma group and CVA group also had statistically significant differences compared with bronchitis group (P 〈 0.05) , but the difference between asthma group and CVA group was not statistically significant (P 〉 0.05). Conclusions Airway responsiveness and airway sensitivity of children with different respiratory diseases such as asthma, CVA and bronchitis are higher than those of healthy children, but airway reactivity and airway sensitivity of different respiratory diseases in children are not identical, which may provide a basis for differential diagnosis.
机构地区 天津市儿童医院
出处 《临床儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第8期734-738,共5页 Journal of Clinical Pediatrics
关键词 儿童 呼吸系统疾病 气道反应性 child respiratory system disease airway responsiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组.儿童支气管哮喘防治常规(试行)[J].中华儿科杂志,2004,42(2):100-106. 被引量:2630
  • 2胡亚美,江载芳.诸福棠实用儿科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:632-636.
  • 3Kang I-I, Koh YY, Yoo Y, et ol. Maximal airway response to methacholine in cough variant asthma: comparison with classic asthma and its relationship to peak expiratory flow variablity [J]. Chest,2005,128(6) :3881-3887.
  • 4Song TW, Kim KW, Kim ES, et al. Correlation between spirometry and impulse oscillometry in children with asthma [J ]. Acta Paediatr, 2008,97 ( 1 ) : 51-5d.
  • 5Tauber E, Fazekas T, Eichler I, et al. Negative expiratory pressure: a new tool for evaluating lung function in children? [J]. Pediatr Pulmono1,2003,35(3) : 162-168.
  • 6Wechsler ME. Managing asthma in primary care: putting new guideline recommendations into context [J. Mayo Clin Proc, 2009,84 ( 8 ) : 707 -717.
  • 7Chipps BE. Asthma in infants and children [J]. Clin Cornerstone, 2008,8 (4) : 44-61.
  • 8van Wonderen KE, van der Mark LB, Mohrs J, et d. Prediction and treatment of asthma in preschool children at risk: study design and baseline data of a prospective cohort study in general practice (ARCADE) [J]. BMC Pulm Med ,2009,9:13.
  • 9Matsumoto H, Niimi A, Takemura M, et al. Features of cough variant asthma and classic asthma duringmethacholine-induced brochoconstriction: a cross-sectional study [J]. Cough ,2009,5:3.
  • 10Nakajima T, Nishimura Y, Nishiuma T, et al. Cough sensitivity in pure cough variant asthma elicited using continuous capsaicin inhalation [J]. Allergol Int,2006,55 (2) : 149-155.

共引文献4519

同被引文献120

引证文献10

二级引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部