期刊文献+

退火态ZTi6Al4V铸造钛合金的断裂韧度研究 被引量:2

Fracture Toughness of ZTi6Al4V Casting Titanium Alloy under Different Annealed Conditions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将尖切口强度理论用于ZTi6Al4V铸造钛合金损伤容限性能的评价,探讨了不同退火温度对其三点弯曲断裂韧度KQ的影响。结果表明:尖切口试样测定的断裂韧度KQ1不等同于标准试验方法测定的KQ,但可用于铸造钛合金不同工艺间断裂韧度的比较。退火温度的改变可微调ZTi6Al4V铸造钛合金的强度和断裂韧度,在700℃或820℃保温2h退火处理,试样的断裂韧度较好,KQ值分别达到78.11 MPa.m1/2和79.44MPa.m1/2,屈服强度分别为782.74MPa和771.49MPa,抗拉强度分别为860.18MPa和853.0MPa,伸长率达8.10%和7.46%,获得了较好的强塑性匹配。 The theory of notch strength was used to judge the damage tolerance capability of ZTi6A14V casting titanium alloy,for exampie,the effect of annealing temperature on three-point bending fracture toughness. The results show that fracture toughness Kql , which was tested by notched specimens,is not equal to the KQ tested by the standard testing method. But it was used to compare qualitatively fracture toughness of casting titanium alloy with different annealing processes. The changing of annealing temperature can adjust strength and fracture toughness of ZTi6A14V casting titanium alloy. Samples annealed at 700℃ and 8000C for 2h have better toughness, the KQ values are 78.11 MPa ml/2and 79.44MPa m1/2. They also have a relatively better rnateh of strength and plasticity, that is the yield strength is up to 782.74MPa and 771.49MPa, tensile strength reaches 860.18MPa and 853.0MPa, and the elongation reaches 8.10% and 7.46% respectively.
出处 《航空材料学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期87-91,共5页 Journal of Aeronautical Materials
关键词 铸造钛合金 退火 断裂韧度 casting titanium alloy annealing fracture toughness
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1OHKUBO C, FORD J P, OKABE T,et al. The machinability of cast titanium and Ti-6Al-4V[J].Biomaterials, 2000,21(4):421-428.
  • 2CUI C X, HU B X, ZHAO L X,et al. Titanium alloy production technology, market prospects and industry development[J].Materials and Design, 2011,32(3):1684-1691.
  • 3OBERWINKLER B, RIEDLER M, EICHLSEDER W. Importance of local microstructure for damage tolerant light weight design of Ti-6Al-4V forgings [J].International Journal of Fatigue, 2010,32(5):808-814.
  • 4曹春晓.选材判据的变化与高损伤容限钛合金的发展[J].金属学报,2002,38(z1):4-11. 被引量:104
  • 5CHANDRARAO B S, SRINIVAS M, KAMAT S V. Effect of temperature on fracture toughness of timetal 834 titanium alloy under mode I and mixed I/III loading[J].Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 2008,39:1340-1349.
  • 6CHEN Y Y, NIU H Z, KONG F T. et al. Microstructure and fracture toughness of α β phase contain TiAl alloy [J]. Intermetallics.2011,19:1405-1410.
  • 7ZHANG J K, CHENG X Q, LI Z N. Total fatigue life prediction for Ti-alloys airframe structure based on durability and damage-tolerant design concept[J].Materials and Design, 2010,31(9):4239-4335.
  • 8束德林. 工程材料的力学行为[M].北京:机械工业出版社.2006:91-93.
  • 9WILLIAMS J C, STARKE E A. Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems[J].Acta Materialia, 2003,51(19):5775.
  • 10ZHENG X L. On an unified model for predicting notch strength and fracture toughness[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1989,33(5):685-695.

二级参考文献35

  • 1付兴辉 金宗哲.-[J].硅酸盐通报,1996,5(2):28-33.
  • 2[1]TUPPOR N G.Fracture Prevention and Control[M].Calif:Los Angeles,1972.159.
  • 3[3]DING R,GUO Z X.Microstructural evolution of Ti-6Al-4V alloy during b-phase processing[J].Materials Science and Engineering A,2004,A365:172-179.
  • 4[4]FILIP R,KUBIAK K,ZIAJIA W,et al.The effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of two-phase titanium alloys[J].Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2003,133:84-89.
  • 5[5]L(U)TJERING G.Influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of a + b titanium alloys[J].Materials Science and Engineering A,1998,A243:32-45.
  • 6[3]吴学仁主编.飞机结构金属材料力学性能手册,第二卷(损伤容限).北京:航空工业出版社,1996
  • 7[4]Pearson H S, Pachman P F. Fracture Prevention and Control. Calif. : Los Angeles, 1972:21
  • 8[5]Tuppor N G. Fracture Prevention and Control. Calif. :Los Angeles, 1972:159
  • 9[8]Rolfe S T. ASM Seminar on Fracture Control. Philadelphia: 1970
  • 10[9]Shults J M. SAE 730884. 1973

共引文献120

同被引文献21

  • 1刘睿,惠松骁,叶文君,熊柏青,于洋,付艳艳.热处理工艺对TB10钛合金动态断裂韧性的影响[J].稀有金属,2010,34(4):485-490. 被引量:8
  • 2张庆玲,李兴无.TA15钛合金两类组织对疲劳性能和断裂韧度的影响[J].材料工程,2007,35(7):3-5. 被引量:16
  • 3GB/T21143—2007金属材料准静态断裂韧度的统一试验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
  • 4International Organization for Standardization. ISO 12135- 2002(E) International standard of unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness [ S ]. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2002.
  • 5ASTM International. ASTM E1820-08a Standard test meth- ods for measurement of fracture toughness [ S]. Annual Book of ASTM Standards: Vol 301. Philadelphia, PA: A- merican Society for Testing and Materials, 2005.
  • 6姚蘅.ASTblE813-87J1C断裂韧性试验方法:节译稿[S].北京:冶金部钢铁研究总院,1988:20-37.
  • 7姚蘅,邓枝生,邓其源.GB/T2038--1991金属材料延性断裂韧度J1C试验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002:387-411.
  • 8RICE J R, BOSENGREN G F. Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a power-law hardening material [ J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1968, 16 (1): 1-12.
  • 9蔡力勋,陈洪军,包陈.关于断裂力学柔度测试技术的新思考[J].核动力工程,2006(10):134-138.
  • 10EMST H A, PARIS P C, LANDES J D. Estimations on J- integral and tearing modulus T from a single specimen test record[J]. Fract Mech, ASTM STP 743, American Socie- ty for Testing and Materials, 1981:476 -502.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部