期刊文献+

淋巴结转移率对胃癌预后价值的评价 被引量:6

Prognostic Value of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Gastric Cancer Patients After Surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价淋巴结转移率(MLR)对胃癌术后患者预后的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析2004年至2006年间在我院就诊,临床资料完整的363例胃癌术后患者。按照第七版UICC/TNM(pN分期)及淋巴结转移率两种方法对淋巴结进行分期,比较两种方法评价胃癌预后的准确性及适用性,确定MLR分期方法的特点及优势。结果:363例胃癌术后患者按单变量生存分析方法将淋巴结转移率(MLR)分为四期:MLR0(0.0%)、MLR1(0-30%)、MLR2(30-70%)、MLR3(≥70%),其5年生存率分别为84.9%、58.3%、28.7%、12.9%,有显著性统计学差异(P<0.001)。pN分期分为pN0、pN1、pN2、pN3a、pN3b,其5年生存率分别为84.9%、60.8%、32.0%、21.9%、6.8%,有显著性统计学差异(P<0.001)。单因素COX生存分析后显示,MLR分期越高,预后越差(HR:MLR1,MLR2,MLR3/MLR0=1.589,4.455,9.900,P<0.001)。按清除淋巴结个数将所有病例分成两组:group1(≤15个)、group2(>15个),在该两组中比较pN及MLR分期的预后,结果显示pN3a在group1组中的5年生存率明显低于group2组(6.2%vs.38.4%,P<0.001),而MLR分期与清除淋巴结个数无统计学生存相关差异(P>0.05)。COX比例风险模型多因素分析表明,pN分期、MLR分期、肿瘤浸润深度、肿瘤分化程度均为影响预后的独立因素,以pN及MLR分期风险比最高。结论:MLR分期是评价胃癌术后患者预后的独立因素,该方法不受淋巴结清扫个数的影响,与pN分期方法相比,实用、准确、简单,可以降低pN分期因淋巴结清扫不足造成的期别转移现象。 Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio by comparing with the 7th AJCC, UICC/TNM classification (pN) in patients with gastric cancer after surgery. Method: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and pathological data of 363 patients who had undergone curative surgery at our institution more than 5 years. The MLR was assessed into 4 categories: 0, 0-0.3, 0.3-0.7, 〉 0.7. The MLR classification was compared with pN classification in terms of the accuracy and valid value. Results: Both the MLR system and pN system were well classified patients with significantly different prognosis (P〈0.001). Patients were divided into two groups: groupl (≤15 examined lymph nodes), group 2 (≥15 lymph nodes). Patients belonged to the group 1, the 5 year survival rate ofpN3a was significant lower than that in group 2(6.2 % vs. 38.4 %,P〈0.001 ). While the 5 year survival of MLR in group 1 and group 2 had no significantly differences, P〉0.05. By the way of Cox proportional regression hazard model, the text revealed that the degree of dif- ferentiation, depth of invasion, MLR and pN staging system were independently prognostic factors. The main hazard of the two models was the lymph node classification. Conclusion: Our findings confirmed the role of MLR staging system as independent prognostic factors of survival in patients with gastric cancer surgically treated. The MLR staging system which was a more practical and effective approach to evaluate the prognosis with gastric cancer could decrease the staging immigration.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2012年第18期3547-3552,共6页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 胃癌 淋巴结转移率 预后因素 COX回归模型 Gastric cancer Metastatic of Lymph node ratio Prognostic factor Cox regression Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1Huang, Chang-Ming,Lin, Jian-Xian,Zheng, Chao-Hui,Li, Ping,Xie, Jian-Wei,Lin, Bi-Juan,Wang, Jia-Bin.Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(16):2055-2060. 被引量:22
  • 2Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225-249.
  • 3Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
  • 4Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
  • 5Yokota T, Ishiyama S, Saito T, Teshima S, Narushima Y, Murata K, Iwamoto K, Yashima R, Yamauchi H, Kikuchi S. Lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in gastric cancer: a multiple logistic regression analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 380-384.
  • 6Yoo CH, Noh SH, Kim YI, Min JS. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer. World J Surg 1999; 23: 492-497; discussion 497-498.
  • 7Hermanek P. pTNM and residual tumor classifications: problems of assessment and prognostic significance. World J Surg 1995;19:184-190.
  • 8Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 1604-1608.
  • 9Ichikawa D, Kurioka H, Ueshima Y, Shirono K, Kan K, Shioaki Y, Lee CJ, Hamashima T, Deguchi E, Ikeda E, Mutoh F, Yamagishi H. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2003; 50: 301-304.
  • 10Coburn NG, Swallow CJ, Kiss A, Law C. Significant regional variation in adequacy of lymph node assessment and survival in gastric cancer. Cancer 2006; 107: 2143-2151.

共引文献30

同被引文献36

  • 1于俊秀,吴育连,杨立涛.淋巴结转移率评估T_3期胃癌病人预后的价值[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(13):922-925. 被引量:12
  • 2陈军,严超,朱正纲,燕敏,陈克敏,诸琦,刘炳亚,尹浩然,林言箴.内镜超声检查和多层螺旋CT对胃癌术前T、N分期的比较研究[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(5):278-281. 被引量:17
  • 3季加孚.胃癌外科的现状与发展趋势[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2006,13(1):1-3. 被引量:65
  • 4孙菁,孙益红,秦新裕,曾蒙苏,王敏桦,曾昭冲.胃癌术后腹腔淋巴结转移放疗的疗效分析[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(4):277-280. 被引量:10
  • 5Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours., revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer,2009,45(2) :228-247.
  • 6Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. CTCAE V3.0 : develop- ment of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2003,13 (3) 176-181.
  • 7张信强.DCF方案对36例胃癌术前新辅助化疗的临床观察.临床探讨,2010,48(3):140-141.
  • 8Coimbra FJ, Costa WL Jr, Montagnini AL, et al. The inter- action between N-category and N-ratio as a new tool to im- prove lymph node metastasis staging in gastric cancer: results of a single cancer center in Brazi. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2011, 37 (1): 47-54.
  • 9Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M,et al. Ratio betweenmetastatic and examined lymph nodes is anindependent prognostic factor after D2 resection forgastric cancer: analysis of a large Europeanmonoinstitutional experience [J ] . Ann Surg Oru ol,2003,10;l077-85.
  • 10Bando E,Yonemura Y,Taniguchi K,et al. Outcomeof ratio of lymph node metastasis in gastric carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol.2002 .9 : 775-784.

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部