期刊文献+

原料肉的机械前处理工艺对猪肉切片火腿品质的影响 被引量:6

Effect of mechanical pretreatment technology for raw meat on qualities of porcine sliced ham
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了改善猪肉切片火腿出水、质构和口感问题,以精选猪后腿肉的股四头肌为主要原料,研究5种机械处理工艺对猪肉切片火腿系水性(蒸煮损失率、压榨失水率和杀菌失水率)、质构特性(硬度、弹性、内聚性和咀嚼度)、色泽和感官品质的影响。5种对原料肉的机械处理工艺包括只滚揉、注射腌制液后滚揉、嫩化后滚揉、注射后嫩化滚揉、腰刀绞制后滚揉。结果表明:注射和嫩化均可显著降低火腿的蒸煮损失率和压榨失水率,注射后嫩化滚揉的火腿的蒸煮损失率最低,为7.90%,而腰刀绞制后滚揉的火腿切片杀菌失水率最低,为2.66%,注射后嫩化滚揉与腰刀绞制后滚揉的火腿压榨失水率均最低,并且均显著低于其他处理组。注射和嫩化均可提高产品的硬度、内聚性和咀嚼度,注射嫩化滚揉组合处理与进行1种机械处理或2种机械处理相比,样品具有更好的质构特性,但是5种机械处理工艺中,腰刀绞制后滚揉的猪肉火腿硬度、内聚性和咀嚼度均最大。注射和嫩化有利于提高产品的亮度值(L*)和红度值(a*),降低产品的黄度值(b*)。通过感官评价可知,只经过滚揉的火腿具有最差的感官品质,注射后滚揉和嫩化后滚揉火腿的感官品质差异不大,注射后嫩化滚揉的火腿的质地和切片性低于腰刀绞制后滚揉的火腿,但是显肉性和色泽优于腰刀绞制后滚揉火腿。因此,工业化生产建议原料肉采用注射后嫩化滚揉处理,猪肉切片火腿具有最好的品质。 To improve water exuding,textures and edible quality of porcine ham,the effects of five raw meat mechanical treatments on porcine sliced ham quality characteristics were investigated.The five mechanical treatments included only tumbling,post-injection tumbling,post-tenderization tumbling,post-injection tenderization and tumbling,post-grinding with broadsword and tumbling.Hams were prepared of Quadriceps femoris from prok hind leg muscle.Water binding characteristics(cooking loss,expressible moisture(EM),pasteurization water loss),textural characteristics(hardness,springiness,cohesiveness,chewiness),color parameters and sensory quality of hams were detected.The results showed that injection or tenderization could help to significantly decrease the cooking loss and expressible moisture of the hams,and the lowest cooking loss of hams made by post-injection tenderization and tumbling treatment was 7.90%.The hams subjected to post-grinding with broadsword and tumbling exhibited the lowest pasteurization water loss,which was 2.66%.Besides,the hams made by post-injection tenderization and tumbling treatment and the post-grinding with broadsword and tumbling treatment exhibited the lowest pasteurization water loss which was significantly lower than that in the other treatments.Injection and tenderization improved the hardness,cohesiveness and chewiness of the products.The hams manufactured by post-injection tenderization and tumbling treatment showed better texture characteristics than those made by only one treatment or combination of two treatments.However,among the five mechanical treatments,the hams made by post-grinding with broadsword and tumbling treatment exhibited the largest hardness,cohesiveness and chewiness properties.In addition,injection and tenderization improved the lightness and redness,but decreased the yellowness of the hams.Sensory evaluation results indicated that the only tumbling treatment resulted in the worse sensory qualities of the hams,there were no significant differences in sensory qualities between the two kinds of hams which were made by post-injection and post-tenderization tumbling.The sensory textures and sliceability of the hams produced by post-injection tenderization and tumbling treatment were less than those hams made by post-grinding with broadsword and tumbling treatment,but higher visibility of meat matrix and better colour properties were exhibited.Therefore,it’s suggested that in industrialized production by post-injection tenderization and tumbling of raw meat porcine sliced ham has the best qualities.
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第14期250-255,共6页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 江苏省科技成果转化项目(BA2009007) 国家"973"计划项目(2010CB735700)
关键词 品质保证 质构 机械处理 注射 刀片嫩化 滚揉 切片火腿 meat quality assurance textures mechanical treatments injection blade tenderization tumbling sliced ham
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Lachowicz K, Sobczak M, Gajowiecki L. Effects of massaging time on texture, rheological properties, and structure of three pork ham muscles[J]. Meat Science, 2003,63 (2): 225-233.
  • 2Tyszkiewicz I, Jakubiec-Puka A. Ultrastructure of mechanically tenderised pork muscle[J]. Meat Science, 1995, 41(3): 273-282.
  • 3Kolle B K, McKenna D R, Savell J W. Methods to increase tenderness of individual muscles from beef rounds when cooked with dry or moist heat[J]. Meat Science, 2004, 68(1): 145- 154.
  • 4Pietrasik Z, Shand P J. Effect of blade tenderization and tumbling time on the processing characteristics and tenderness of injected cooked roast beef[J]. Meat Science, 2004, 66(4): 871-879.
  • 5Savell J W, Smith G C, Carpenter Z L. Blade tenderization of four muscles from three weight-grade groups of beef[J]. Journal of Food Science, 1977, 42(4): 866-871.
  • 6Flores H A, Kastner C L, Kropf D H, et al. Effects of blade tenderization and trimming of connective tissue on hot-boned, restructured, pre-cooked roasts from cows[J]. Journal of Food Science, 1986, 51(5): 1176- 1179.
  • 7Mandigo R W, Olson D G. Effect of blade size for mechanically tenderizing beef rounds[J]. Journal of Food Science, 1982, 47(6): 2095-2096.
  • 8孙建清,徐宝才,周辉,王赟,李景军.低温肉制品关键工艺及装备技术应用研究进展[J].食品科学,2010,31(23):454-460. 被引量:21
  • 9Baublits R T, Pohlman F W, Brown A H J, et al. Effects of sodium chloride, phosphate type and concentration, and pump rate on beef biceps femoris quality and sensory characteristics[J]. Meat Science, 2005, 70(2): 205-214.
  • 10Baublits R T, Pohlman F W, Brown A H J, et al. Enhancement with varying phosphate types, concentrations, and pump rates, without sodium chloride on beef biceps femoris quality and sensory characteristics[J]. Meat Science, 2006, 72(3): 404-414.

二级参考文献59

共引文献86

同被引文献126

  • 1余恺,胡卓炎,黄智洵,陈昌实.微波杀菌研究进展及其在食品工业中的应用现状[J].食品工业科技,2005,26(7):185-189. 被引量:52
  • 2Lachowicz K, Sobczak M, Gajowiecki L. Effects of massa- ging time on texture, rheological properties, and structure of three pork ham muscles [ J]. Meat Science, 2003,63 (2): 225-233.
  • 3Tyszkiewicz I, Jakubiec-Puka A. Ultrastructure of mechan- ically tenderised pork muscle [ J]. Meat Science, 1995, 41 (3) : 273 -282.
  • 4Katsaras K, Budras K D. The relationship of the micro- structure of cooked ham to its properties and quality [ J ]. Lebensmittel Wissen Schaft Und Technologie, 1993, 26 (3): 229-234.
  • 5Ghavimi B, Rogers R W, Ahhen TG. Effects if non-vacu- um, vacuum and nitrogen back-flushed tumbling on various characteristics of restructured cured beef [ J]. Journal of Food Science, 1986, 51 (5): 1 166-1 168.
  • 6Krause R J, Ockerman H W, Krol B, et al. Influence of tumbling, tumbling time, trim and sodium tripolyphosphate on quality and yield of cured hams [ J]. Journal of FoodScience, 1978, 43 : 853 - 855.
  • 7Szerman N, Gonzalez C B, Sancho A M, et al. Effect of whey protein concentrate and sodium chloride addition plus tumbling procedures on technological parameters, physical properties and visual appearance of sous vide cooked beef [J]. Meat Science, 2007, 76 (3): 463 -473.
  • 8Hayes J E, Kenny T A, Ward P, et al. Development of a modified dry curing process for beef [ J]. Meat Science, 2007, 77 (3): 314-323.
  • 9Deumier F, Bohuon P, Tystram G, et al. Pulsed vacuum brining of poultry meat: experimental study on the impact of vacuum cycles on mass transfer [ J ]. Journal of Food Engineering. 2003, 58 ( 1 ) : 75 - 83.
  • 10Smith D P, Young L L. Marination pressure and phos- phate effects on broiler breast fillet yield, tenderness, and color[J]. Poultry Science , 2007, 86:2 666-2 670.

引证文献6

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部