期刊文献+

标准化生产、最优知识产权保护和内生增长 被引量:2

Standardization,Optimal Intellectual Property Right Protection,and Endogenous Growth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在Acemoglu et al.(2010)的基础上建立了一个动态一般均衡模型,其中产品周期分为创新和标准化两个阶段——刚创新出来的产品只能由高技能劳动力生产,而将其标准化之后就可以由工资较低的低技能劳动力生产。尽管标准化之后生产成本更低,但也更易为竞争对手模仿。知识产权保护可以缓解企业在创新和标准化决策之间的困境。本文模型对内生增长理论和国际贸易理论提供了更新的研究方法,并得到结论:一、本文模型丰富了内生增长理论;二、本文从新的角度解释了为什么南方国家的知识产权保护要弱于北方国家;三、知识产权保护越弱越会伤害低技能工人的利益,加剧工资不平等。 We establish a dynamic general equilibrium model where the product cycle takes two steps, innovation and then standardization, which are introduction of newly innovated goods produced only by skilled workers, and a costly process that enables the new goods can be produced also by unskilled workers. Since the standardized products can be easier to be imitated by other rivals, firms have to face the trade - off between innovation and standardization. So intellectual property right protection is suggested to alleviate the dilemma. Our analysis contributes to present research a number of new methods and novel results. First, the innovation -standardization model contributes to the endogenous growth theory a new approach. Second, we illustrate novel reasons why intellectual property right protection is weaker in south countries. Finally, we show that weaker intellectual property protection harms the low skilled workers.
作者 闫佳 许志成
出处 《南方经济》 CSSCI 2012年第7期117-130,共14页 South China Journal of Economics
基金 章平博士的广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目(项目号10451806001004779)的资助
关键词 知识产权 创新 标准化 内生增长 innovation standardization intellectual property right endogenous growth
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Acemoglu, Daron, Philippe Aghion and Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2006, "Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth", Journal of the European Economic Association, 4 ( l ), pp. 37 - 74.
  • 2Acemoglu, Daron, Gino Gancia and Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2010, "Competting Engines of Growth: Innovation and Standardization", Journal of Economic Theory, Forthcoming.
  • 3Bah'o, Robert J. and Xavier Sala- i -Martin, 1997, "Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth", Journal of Economic Growth, 2 (1), pp. 1-26.
  • 4Branstetter, Lee, Raymond J. Fisman, C. Fritz Foley and Kamal Saggi. 2007. "Intellectual Property Rights, Imitation, and Foreign Direct Investment: Theory and Evidence," NBER Working Paper, No. W13033.
  • 5Branstetter, Lee and Kamal S/ggi. 2009. "Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Direct Investment, and Industrial Development," NBER Working Paper, No. 15393.
  • 6Broda, Chiristian and David E. Weinstein, 2006, "Globalization and the Gains from Variety", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 (2), pp. 541 - 85.
  • 7Ethier, Wilfred J. and James R. Markusen, 1996, "Multinational Firms, Technology Diffusion and Trade", Journal of International Economics, 41 (1-2), pp. 1-28.
  • 8Freeman, Richard B. 1996, "Demand for Education," in Handbook of Labor EconomicsEds. by Ashenfelter, O. and R. Layard, . Amsterdam : Elsevier, 357 - 86.
  • 9Gawande, Kishore, Pravin Krishna and Michael J. Robbins, 2006, "Foreign Lobbies and U.S. Trade Policy", Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (3), pp. 563-71.
  • 10Grossman, Gene and Elhanan Helpman, 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

二级参考文献201

共引文献387

同被引文献16

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部