期刊文献+

秸秆还田与施肥对塿土酶活性的影响 被引量:9

The Effect of Straws Returning into Field on Lou Soil Enzyme Activities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用大田定位试验,在小麦-玉米轮作条件下,以小麦品种"西农889"和玉米品种"郑单958"为供试作物,研究秸秆还田与厩肥和氮磷肥,不同配施方式下,土壤酶活性的变化规律。结果表明,在小麦-玉米轮作条件下,秸秆还田配合施用氮肥,土壤纤维素酶、蔗糖酶和脲酶的活性最高。土壤纤维素酶活性最大值为0.63U1,比对照高18.20%;蔗糖酶活性最大值为70.62U1,是对照的1.36倍;脲酶活性最大值为3.58U2,比对照高0.18U2。秸秆还田后配合施用氮肥,可提高土壤酶活性。土壤酶活性间关系分析表明,蔗糖酶与脲酶活性显著相关,纤维素酶活性和蔗糖酶活性间、纤维素酶活性和脲酶活性间相关性不显著。土壤酶活性与温度间关系分析表明,土壤脲酶活性与土壤温度均呈显著相关,土壤纤维素酶和蔗糖酶活性与土壤温度的相关性不显著。秸秆还田配合施用氮肥可提高土壤酶活性,是较好的施肥方式。 To investigate the changes of soil enzyme activities, a field experiment was conducted in a short-term experiment under the wheat-maize rotation system. The results showed that in wheat-maize growing stage, cellulase activities, invertase activities and urease activities have the highest values in the SN treatment. The peak value of cellulase was 0.63 U1 , which was 18.20% higher than the control treatment. The peak value of invertase was 70.62 U1, which was 1.36 times higher compared to the control treatment. The peak value of urease was 3.58 U2 ,which was higher than the control treatment by 0.18U2. Significant correlation was found between the uraese activity and the invertase activity, also between the uraese activity and soil temperature, but not among the invertase activity, cellulase activity and soil temperature. Straw returning + N fertilizer is a better way of fertilization.
出处 《西北农业学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期196-201,共6页 Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(40871119,41171203) 农业部“948”项目(2010-Z20)
关键词 秸秆 有机肥 化肥 土壤酶活性 Straws Manure fertilizer Chemical fertilizer Enzyme activities
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Marx M C, Wood M, Jarvis S C. A microplate fluorimetric assay for the study of enzyme diversity in soils[J]. Soil Biol Bioch,2001,33:1633 1640.
  • 2Yao X H, Min H, Lu Z H, Yuan H P. Influence of acet amiprid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration[J]. Eur J Soil Bio,2006 ,42: 120-126.
  • 3姜勇,梁文举,闻大中.免耕对农田土壤生物学特性的影响[J].土壤通报,2004,35(3):347-351. 被引量:95
  • 4周礼恺.土壤酶活性的总体在评价土壤肥力水平中的作用.土壤学报,1983,20(4):413-413.
  • 5Bergstrom D M,King D J. Sensitivity of soil enzyme activi ties to conservation practiees[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1998, 62: 1286-1295.
  • 6Bandick A K D P. Field management effects on soil enzyme activities[J]. Soil Biology and Biochem, 1999, 31: 1471- 1479.
  • 7李腊梅,陆琴,严蔚东,王校常.太湖地区稻麦二熟制下长期秸秆还田对土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤,2006,38(4):422-428. 被引量:48
  • 8李焕珍,张忠源,杨伟奇,李纪柏,张继宏,潘贺玲,李福祥,徐萍,刘乙俭,金福兰,王永清.玉米秸秆直接还田培肥效果的研究[J].土壤通报,1996,27(5):213-215. 被引量:56
  • 9耿玉辉,吴景贵,李万辉,姜岩.作物残体培肥土壤的研究进展[J].吉林农业大学学报,2000,22(2):76-79. 被引量:40
  • 10温明霞 林德枝 易时来 李学平 孟涛 石孝均.秸秆在土壤中的养分释放动态研究.西南农业学报,2004,:276-278.

二级参考文献286

共引文献938

同被引文献147

引证文献9

二级引证文献148

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部