期刊文献+

术前营养风险评估对老年直肠癌患者围手术期营养状况的影响 被引量:14

Effect of preoperative nutritional risk to postoperative nutritional status of elderly rectal cancer patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析营养风险评估对老年直肠癌患者围手术期营养状况的影响。方法应用营养风险筛查2002(NRS-2002)对85例老年直肠癌患者进行术前营养风险筛查,根据筛查结果将患者分为有营养风险组25例和无营养风险组60例,分别于术前1d、术后1d、术后7d检测两组患者的白蛋白(ALB)、前白蛋白(PALB)、血总淋巴细胞计数(TLC)和转铁蛋白(TFN),比较其差异。结果术前85例患者中25例NRS-2002≥3分,存在营养风险,营养风险发生率为29.4%。术前1d两组患者各血清指标比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);术后1d,营养风险组PALB为(12.4±3.7)mg/L低于无营养风险组(14.3±3.9)mg/L,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(1=2.026,P〈0.05);术后7d营养风险组ALB、TFN值低于无营养风险组,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t分别为2.412,2.153;P〈O.05)。结论存在营养风险的老年直肠癌患者围手术期营养状况变化明显,临床护理人员应对该类患者进行相应的营养指导。 Objective To investigate the effect of nutritional risk to nutritional status of peroperative elderly rectal cancer patients. Methods 85 elderly patients with rectal cancer were screened for preoperative nutritional status by NRS-2002 and divided into nutritional risk group and non-nutritional risk group. ALB, PALB, TLC and TFN of two groups were measured 1 day before operation, 1 day and 7 days after operation. The values were compared between two groups. Results Before operation, 25 patients out of 85 were at nutritional risk with NRS-2002≥3 and incidence of nutritional risk of 29.4%. The PALB value of the nutritional risk group was significantly lower than that of the non-nutritional risk group 1 day after operation [ ( 12.4±37 ) mg/L vs ( 14.3±3.9) mg/L; t = 2. 026, P 〈 O. 05 ~. After 7 days, the average levels of all indexes of the nutritional risk group were lower than those of the non-nutritional risk group. Among those, differences of ALB and TFN values between two groups were significant ( t = 2. 412, 2. 153, respectively ; P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions Perioperative nutritional status of elderly rectal cancer patients at nutritional risk changes conspicuously and should be given relevant nutritional auidance bv nurses.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2012年第18期2165-2167,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 老年人 直肠肿瘤 营养风险筛查 营养状况 Elderly patients Rectal cancer Nutritional risk screening Nutritional status
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1揭彬,蒋朱明,朱赛楠,Marie Nolan,于康,梁晓坤.营养干预、营养风险对临床结局影响研究的方法学[J].中国临床营养杂志,2008,16(6):367-370. 被引量:20
  • 2李月秋,赵江,王维利,张淼,李成.住院患者营养风险筛查研究现状与展望[J].中华现代护理杂志,2011,17(16):1965-1968. 被引量:5
  • 3Sorensen J, Kondrup J, Prokopowicz J, et al. EuroOOPS : an international, multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome. Clin Nutr, 2008,27 ( 3 ) : 340 -349.
  • 4Johansen N, Kondrup J, Plum L, et al. Effect of nutritional support on clinical outcome in patients at nutritional risk. ClinNutr, 2004,23(4) :539-550.
  • 5Michele L, Silvia K, Zeno S. Nutritional screening tools in daily clinical practice: the focus on cancer. Support Care in Cancer, 2010, 18 ( suppl 2 ) : s17-s27.
  • 6Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, et al. Nutritional risk screening ( NRS 2002 ) : a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr, 2003,22 (3) :321-336.
  • 7迟俊涛,高凤莉,宋振兰,鲁重美.不同营养评价工具在消化道肿瘤患者中应用的比较[J].中华现代护理杂志,2010,16(7):748-751. 被引量:11

二级参考文献68

  • 1陈伟,蒋朱明,张永梅,王秀荣,陈春明,史轶蘩.欧洲营养不良风险调查方法在中国住院患者的临床可行性研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):137-141. 被引量:215
  • 2王洁贞,赵跃进,马会妍,刘言训.Kappa统计量及其应用[J].中国卫生统计,1995,12(6):49-50. 被引量:22
  • 3喻姣花,谭翠莲,黄海燕,孙新.胃及结直肠癌患者围术期营养状况调查分析[J].护理学杂志(外科版),2006,21(9):69-70. 被引量:9
  • 4梁晓坤,揭彬,蒋朱明.营养风险理念解读[J].中国临床营养杂志,2007,15(3):167-170. 被引量:59
  • 5Sobotka L Basics in clinical nutrition [M]. 3rd. London: Galen, 2004: 11-18.
  • 6Kondrup J, Rasmussen H, Hamberg O, et al. Nutritional risk screening (NRS2002) : a new method based on an a- nalysis of controlled clinical trials [ J ]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22 ( 3 ) :321-336.
  • 7Jiang Z, Chen W, Zhan W, et al. Parenteral and enteral nutrition application in West, Middle and East of China: a multi-centre investigation for 15098 patients in 13 metropolitans using NRS tool [ J ]. Clin Nutr, 2007, 2 ( Suppl ) : 133-134.
  • 8Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia MB, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002 [J]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22(4) : 415-421.
  • 9Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status [ J ]. JPEN, 1987, 11(1):8-13.
  • 10Gazzotti C, Albert A, Pepinster A, et al. Clinical usefulness of the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) scale in geriatric medicine [ J]. J Nuix Health Aging, 2000, 4 (3) : 176-181.

共引文献32

同被引文献134

引证文献14

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部