摘要
对罗尔斯的法治理论有两种解读,一种是形式法治论,另一种是实质法治论。但形式法治论不能解释罗尔斯对法律的形式要求源自对自由的保证,而实质法治论证又不能解释为何罗尔斯认为法治与不正义是相容的。如果将对自由的保证看做是对权力正当性的形式要求,则可以很好地理解罗尔斯对法治的论述。在这种理解的基础上,探讨以权力正当性的形式要求为基础的形式法治论,可以说明形式法治的道德价值在于削弱权力本身之恶。
There are two ways to interpret Rawls' theory of rule-by-law: one is the formal rule-by-law; the other is essential rule-by-law. The former can not explain Rawls' formal requirement of law originates form the guarantee of freedom and the latter can not explain why he thinks rule-by-law is compatible with injustice. If we regard the guarantee of freedom as the requirement of the justice of right, a good understanding of Rawls' theory of rule-by-law can be reached. Based on this, an exploration into the formal rule-by-law based on the formal requirement of justice of right can explain the moral value of formal ruleby-law lies in reducing evil in right.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期95-99,共5页
Seeking Truth
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"促进社会公平正义与政府治理研究"
项目编号:10zd&040
吉林大学"985工程"项目
关键词
形式法治
规则
权力正当性
formal rule-by-law
regulation
justice of right