中国证券监管治理的国际经验借鉴与评估体系重构被引量：6

International Experience Learning and Reconstruction of Assessment Indicator System of Chinese Security Regulation and Governance

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过借鉴证券监管治理评估的国际经验并加入独立设计的指标,构建中国证券监管治理评估指标体系并作出评估。研究结果表明,中国证券监管治理评估指数为68.48。考虑到中国证券市场所处的发展阶段,这个成绩反映了真实情形,说明中国证券监管虽然已基本具备良好监管治理的形式,但也存在不足之处,需要从独立性、责任性、透明度和监管操守四个方面加强监管治理。 On the base of international experience and some designed indicators on their own, the authors established the indicator system to estimate securities supervision and governance in China. The results show that the assessing index of Chinese supervision and governance is 68.48, which is a real status if we take the development stage of Chinese securities markets into account. It shows although Chinese securities has basic and good supervising and governing forms, it still has many shortcomings and require to strengthen supervising and governing from four aspects： independence, accountability, transparency and integrity.

作者赵峰高明华

机构地区北京工商大学经济学院北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院

出处《改革》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第7期127-137,共11页 Reform

基金国家社会科学基金项目"终极产权利益侵占与投资者权益保护"(批准号:09BJL023) 教育部人文社科青年基金项目"政治关联企业绩效与权益资本成本--基于中国民营企业的研究"(批准号:12YJC630308) 北京市哲学社会科学首都流通业研究基地项目(批准号:JD-2012-Y-07)

关键词证券监管治理评估指数指标体系 securities regulation and governance, assessment index, indicator system

分类号 F832.1 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Zoido, L., P. Takin- | the Offensive against Corruption. Finance and Develop-] / ment, 2000, 37(2).
2Levy, B., and Spiller, P. T. The Institutional Founda- tions of Regulatory Commitment: A Comparative Analy-sis of Telecommunications Regulation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1994, 10(2), pp.33-34.
3Quintyn, M., Taylor, M.W., Regulatory and Supervi- sory Independence and Financial Stability. IMF Work- ing Paper, No. 2, 2002, pp.3-36.
4Das, U.S., Quintyn, M. Crisis Prevention and Crisis Management:The Role of Regulatory Governance.IMF Working Paper, No. 163, 2002, pp.5-30.
5胡怀邦.金融监管机构的良好治理:内控机制与外部环境[J].中国金融,2005(2):21-24. 被引量：8
6Majone, G. Controlling Regulatory Bureaucracies: Lessons from the American Experience. EUI Working paper, No. 3, 1993, pp.2-16.
7Sundararajan, V., Das, U.S. and Yossifov, P. Cross- Country and Cross-Sector Analysis of Transparency of Monetary and Financial Policies. IMF Working Paper, No.94, 2003, pp.4-39.
8Quintyn, M., Ramirez, S., and Taylor, M. Fear of Freedom: Politicians and the Independence and Ac- countability of Financial Sector Supervisors. IMF Workin- Paoer, No.25, 2007, olo.3-46.
9Arnone, M., Gambini, A. Architectures of Financial Supervisory Authorities and the Basel Core Principal. SSRN Working Paper, No. 48, 2007, pp.2-24.
10于海涛:《证监会完善内部纠错监督机制》,《21世纪经济报道》2009年4月21日.