期刊文献+

Inhibitory effects of carbon dioxide insufflation on pneumoperitoneum and bowel distension after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy 被引量:7

Inhibitory effects of carbon dioxide insufflation on pneumoperitoneum and bowel distension after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To evaluate the inhibitory effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation on pneumoperitoneum and bowel distension after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).METHODS:A total of 73 consecutive patients who were undergoing PEG were enrolled in our study.After eliminating 13 patients who fitted our exclusion criteria,60 patients were randomly assigned to either CO2 (30 patients) or air insufflation (30 patients) groups.PEG was performed by pull-through technique after threepoint fixation of the gastric wall to the abdominal wall using a gastropexy device.Arterial blood gas analysis was performed immediately before and after the procedure.Abdominal X-ray was performed at 10 min and at 24 h after PEG to assess the extent of bowel distension.Abdominal computed tomography was performed at 24 h after the procedure to detect the presence of pneumoperitoneum.The outcomes of PEG for 7 d postprocedure were also investigated.RESULTS:Among 30 patients each for the air and the CO2 groups,PEG could not be conducted in 2 patients of the CO2 group,thus they were excluded.Analyses of the remaining 58 patients showed that the patients' backgrounds were not significantly different between the two groups.The elevation values of arterial partial pressure of CO2 in the air group and the CO2 group were 2.67 mmHg and 3.32 mmHg,respectively (P = 0.408).The evaluation of bowel distension on abdominal X ray revealed a significant decrease of small bowel distension in the CO2 group compared to the air group (P < 0.001) at 10 min and 24 h after PEG,whereas there was no significant difference in large bowel distension between the two groups.Pneumoperitoneum was observed only in the air group but not in the CO2 group (P = 0.003).There were no obvious differences in the laboratory data and clinical outcomes after PEG between the two groups.CONCLUSION:There was no adverse event associated with CO2 insufflation.CO2 insufflation is considered to be safer and more comfortable for PEG patients because of the lower incidence of pneumoperitoneum and less distension of the small bowel. AIM: To evaluate the inhibitory effects of carbon diox- ide (CO2) insufflation on pneumoperitoneum and bowel distension after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). METHODS: A total of 73 consecutive patients who were undergoing PEG were enrolled in our study. After elimi- nating 13 patients who fitted our exclusion criteria, 60 patients were randomly assigned to either CO2 (30 patients) or air insufflation (30 patients) groups. PEG was performed by pull-through technique after three- point fixation of the gastric wall to the abdominal wall using a gastropexy device. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed immediately before and after the procedure. Abdominal X-ray was performed at 10 min and at 24 h after PEG to assess the extent of bowel disten- sion. Abdominal computed tomography was performed at 24 h after the procedure to detect the presence of pneumoperitoneum. The outcomes of PEG for 7 d post- procedure were also investigated. RESULTS: Among 30 patients each for the air and the CO2 groups, PEG could not be conducted in 2 patients of the CO2 group, thus they were excluded. Analyses of the remaining 58 patients showed that the patients' backgrounds were not significantly different between the two groups. The elevation values of arterial partial pressure of CO2 in the air group and the CO2group were 2.67 mmHg and 3.32 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.408). The evaluation of bowel distension on abdomi- nal X ray revealed a significant decrease of small bowel distension in the CO2 group compared to the air group (P 〈 0.001) at 10 min and 24 h after PEG, whereas there was no significant difference in large bowel dis- tension between the two groups. Pneumoperitoneum was observed only in the air group but not in the CO2 group (P = 0.003). There were no obvious differences in the laboratory data and clinical outcomes after PEG between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no adverse event associ- ated with CO2 insufflation. CO2 insufflation is considered to be safer and more comfortable for PEG patients because of the lower incidence of pneumoperitoneum and less distension of the small bowel.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第27期3565-3570,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy Car-bon dioxide insufflation PNEUMOPERITONEUM Abdomi-nal distension Randomized control study 二氧化碳气 抑制作用 小肠 腹胀 胃壁 内镜 CO2分压 扫描程序
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15:872-875.
  • 2Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. 1980. Nutrition 1998; 14:736-738.
  • 3Schrag SP, Sharma R, Jaik NP, Seamon MJ, Lukaszczyk JJ, Martin ND, Hoey BA, Stawicki SP. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. A com- prehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2007; 16: 407-418.
  • 4Rogers BHG. The safety of carbon dioxide insufflation dur- ing colonoscopic electrosurgical polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1974; 20:115-117.
  • 5Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB. Carbon dioxide insufflafion for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1984; 30:68-70.
  • 6Stevenson GW, Wilson JA, Wilkinson J, Norman G, Gooda- cre RL. Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38:564-567.
  • 7Domagk D, Bretthauer M, Lenz P, Aabakken L, Ullerich H, Maaser C, Domschke W, Kucharzik T. Carbon dioxide insufflation improves intubation depth in double-balloon enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Endoscopy 2007; 39:1064-1067.
  • 8Bretthauer M, Seip B, Aasen S, Kordal M, Hoff G, Aabakken L. Carbon dioxide insuffiation for more comfortable endo- scopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Endoscopy 2007; 39:58-64.
  • 9Maple JT, Keswani RN, Hovis RM, Saddedin EZ, Jonnala- gadda S, Azar RR, Hagen C, Thompson DM, Waldbaum L, Edmundowicz SA. Carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP for reduction of postprocedure pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 278-283.
  • 10Ueki T, Mizuno M, Ota S, Ogawa T, Matsushita H, Uchida D, Numata N, Ueda A, Morimoto Y, Kominami Y, Nanba S, Kurome M, Ohe H, Nakagawa M, Araki Y. Carbon dioxide insuffiation is useful for obtaining clear images of the bile duct during peroral cholangioscopy (with video). Gastroin- test Endosc 2010; 71:1046-1051.

同被引文献54

引证文献7

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部