期刊文献+

基于线形与交通状态的山区高速公路追尾事故预测 被引量:27

Prediction of Rear-end Collision on Mountainous Expressway Based on Geometric Alignment and Traffic Conditions
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了进行山区高速公路追尾事故预测并识别追尾事故突出诱导因素,在对两车追尾事故进行类别划分并确定出典型两车追尾事故的基础上,分析了典型两车追尾事故的事故率与线形指标、车速差、大型车混入率、交通量等单一因素间的相关关系。鉴于单一因素与追尾事故率间的关系不能准确描述追尾事故发生规律的缺陷,建立了线形与交通状态组合条件下的追尾事故次数负二项分布预测模型,并给出了模型变量弹性系数计算方法,用以确定追尾事故的突出诱导因素。研究结果表明:基于线形与交通状态的追尾事故负二项分布预测模型能够对追尾事故进行准确预测,利用弹性系数计算方法确定出车速差、年平均日交通量(AADT)以及竖曲线半径为典型两车追尾事故的突出诱导因素。 In order to predict the rear-end collisio on mountainous expressway, typical two-vehicle the relationship between REC rate and the single vehicles, traffic composition and traffic volume between single element and REC rate could not binomial (NB) prediction model based on the developed, and the elasticity coefficient calcul induction factors was proposed. The r accurately. Speed difference, AADT factors for typical two-vehicle REC by n (REC) and identify its main induction factors REC was defined based on its classification, and geometric alignment indexes, speed difference of was analyzed respectively. As the relationship fully describe the occurrence of REC, negative geometric alignment and traffic condition was ation method esults show that the NB used to confirm the prominent prediction model can predict REC and vertical curve radius are confirmed to be prominent the elasticity coefficient calculation method.
出处 《中国公路学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期113-118,共6页 China Journal of Highway and Transport
基金 广东省交通运输厅科技项目(20080206)
关键词 交通工程 山区高速公路 负二项分布预测模型 追尾事故 几何线形 交通状态 弹性系数 traffic engineering mountainous expressway negative binomial prediction model rear-end collision geometric alignment traffic condition elasticity coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1YAN X,RADWAN E, ABDEL-ATY M. Characteris- tics of Rear-end Accidents at Signalized Intersections Using Multiple Logistic Regression Model[J]. Acci- dent Analysis & Prevention, 2005,37 (6) : 983-995.
  • 2HARB R, RADWAN E, YAN X, et al. Light Truck Vehicles (LTVs) Contribution to Rear-end Collisions [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2007,39 (5) : 1026-1036.
  • 3王华荣,孙小端,贺玉龙,胡希元.山区双车道公路尾随相撞事故与道路线形的关系[J].北京工业大学学报,2010,36(9):1236-1241. 被引量:17
  • 4MIAOU S P,SONG J J. Bayesian Ranking of Sites for Engineering Safety Improvements: Decision Parame- ter, Treatability Concept, Statistical Criterion, and Spatial Dependence[J]. Accident Analysis & Preven tion,2005,37(4) :699-720.
  • 5ADELI H,KARIM A. Fuzzy-wavelet RBFNN Model for Freeway Incident Detection[J]. Journal of Trans- portation Engineering, 2000,126 (6) : 464-471.
  • 6孟祥海,郑来,秦观明.基于模糊逻辑的交通事故预测及影响因素分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2009,9(2):87-92. 被引量:24
  • 7CHIOU Y C. An Artificial Neural Network-based Ex- pert System for the Appraisal of Two-car Crash Acci- dents[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2006,38 (4) :777-785.
  • 8高海龙,阚伟生,李长城,庞昌乐.双车道等级公路路侧事故预测模型研究[J].公路交通科技,2007,24(7):127-131. 被引量:15
  • 9CALIENDO C, GUIDA M, PARISI A. A Crash-pre- diction Model for Multilane Roads[J]. Accident Anal- ysis & Prevention,2007,39(4):657-670.
  • 10FU R, GUO Y, YUAN W, et al. The Correlation Be- tween Gradients of Descending Roads and Accident Rates[J]. Safety Science,2011,49(3) :416-423.

二级参考文献28

共引文献51

同被引文献184

引证文献27

二级引证文献147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部