不当行使所有权的刑法评析——以案例分析、学说检讨为中心论

Improper Exercise of the Ownership from the Perspective of Criminal Law——Centering on Case Analysis and Theory Review

以不法手段行使所有权该如何定性,无论在理论界还是司法实务界都颇有争议。如果立足于我国刑法的相关规定,对我国夺取型财产罪的法益采取修正的所有权说,并对最高人民法院公布的两则案例进行实质分析,可以得出合理结论:即行为人如果只是单纯地取回自己所有而被他人占有的财物,不构成财产犯罪,侵犯其他法益的按其他罪名处理;如果行为人在取回财产后又进行索赔,应按诈骗罪论处。

The nature of illegally exercising the ownership is a controversial topic both m theory and judicial practice. Basing on the relevant provisions of the law of our country, modified capturing property crime law ownership, combined with Supreme People＇s court two case analysis, we may reasonably come to the conclusion that the attempt to retrieve all one＇s properties possessed by someone else does not constitute a crime,violations of other legal interests by other charges if the perpetrator is a claim,it should be in accordance with the crime of fraud crime.