期刊文献+

经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比研究 被引量:12

Comparative study on transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TUSPLC)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的手术疗效,探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性、可行性及特点。方法选择山西医科大学第一临床医学院普外科近期施行的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术50例为单孔组,同一医师施行的传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术50例为对照组,比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术中有无副损伤、术后疼痛程度、术后肠功能恢复时间、术后并发症发生率及术后住院时间等指标。结果两组手术均顺利完成,单孔组与对照组平均手术时间分别为(65.20±28.75)min和(61.50±21.00)min,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术中出血量、术后住院时间均无统计学差异(P>0.05);两组术后肠功能恢复时间分别为(22.76±4.22)h和(28.02±5.04)h,单孔组早于对照组(P<0.05)。单孔组术后疼痛程度明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组术中均无副损伤,术后均无出血、胆瘘等并发症发生。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,具有术后疼痛轻、恢复快、腹部瘢痕不明显且隐避等优点,是安全、可行且更加微创的手术。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(TUSPLC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC),and to explore the safety,feasibility and characteristics of transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods Fifty patients undergoing transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(single port group),and fifty patients undergoing traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the same surgeon(control group),were enrolled in this study.The operation time,the operative bleeding volume,the side injury during operation,the degree of postoperative pain,the postoperative intestinal function recovery time,the postoperative complications and the postoperative hospitalized day were recorded and compared.Results All patients successfully completed the surgery.In single port group and control group the operation time was(65.20±28.75)and(61.50±21.00)min,respectively(P〉0.05).Intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay were also not statistically different between 2 groups(P〉0.05).The postoperative intestinal function recovery time in single port group was significantly shorter than in control group [(22.76±4.22)h vs(28.02±5.04)h,P〈0.05].The degree of postoperative pain was lower in single port group than that of control group(P〈0.05).No side injury,postoperative bleeding and complications were found in two groups.Conclusion Transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe,feasible and more minimally invasive way,with the advantages of less postoperative pain,quicker recovery,and no obvious abdominal scar.
出处 《山西医科大学学报》 CAS 2012年第7期528-530,共3页 Journal of Shanxi Medical University
关键词 单孔 腹腔镜 胆囊切除术 single port; laparoscopy; cholecystectomy;
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

  • 1李忠堂,顾伏平,王国喜,吴冬惠,石飞.胆囊后外侧入路行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的应用[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2005,10(1):55-55. 被引量:15
  • 2刘天威,张根福,龚建平.超声刀在胃肠外科手术中的应用(附49例报告)[J].结直肠肛门外科,2006,12(1):33-36. 被引量:15
  • 3John R.Romanelli,David BE.Single-port laparoscopic surgery an overview[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(7):1419-1427.
  • 4Hong TH,You KY,Lee KH.Transumbilical single port Laparoscopic cholecystecto -my:scarless cholecystecotmy[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(6):1393-1397.
  • 5Merchant AM,Michael W,Cook BC,et al.Transumbilical gelport access technique performing single incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS)[J].Gastrointest Surg,2009,13(1):159-162.
  • 6Pheel SJ,Low SC,Sun ZL,etal.Robotic system for no-scar gastrointestinal surgery.Int Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg,2008,4:15-22.
  • 7Hawks JA,RentschlerME,Redden L,et al.Towards an in vivo wireless mobile robot for surgical assistance.Stud Health Technol Inform,2008,132:153-158.
  • 8Navarra G,Pozza E,Occhionorelli S,et al.One-wound Laparoscopic chliecystectomy[J].Br J Surg,1997,84(5):695.
  • 9Rattner D,Kalloo A,Group ASW.ASGE/SAGES Working Group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.October 2005[J].Surg Endosc,2006,20(2):329-333.
  • 10Boni L,Dionigi G,Rovera F.Natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and other allied "ultra" minimally invasive procedures:are we loosing the plot?[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(5):927-929.

共引文献39

同被引文献82

  • 1张琦.经脐部胚胎自然孔道腹腔镜下手术(E—NOTES):初步报告[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2009(1):54-54. 被引量:2
  • 2万东,毛云高,艾刚锋.经脐单孔与常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较分析[J].中华腔镜外科杂志,2010,3(4):325-327.
  • 3Merchant AM, Cook MW, White BC, et al. Transumbilical Gelport access technique for performing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) [ J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2009,13 ( 1 ) : 159 - 162.
  • 4Pal RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME,et al. Transeolonie endoscopic chole- cystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with vide- o ) [ J ]. Gastrointest Endosc,2006,64 ( 3 ) :428 - 434.
  • 5Lee JW,Cho SY,Yeon JS,et al.Laparoscopic pyelolithoto- my:comparison of surgical outcomes in relation to stone distribution within the kidney [J].J Endourol, 2013,27 (5) : 592-597.
  • 6Chinnery GE,Krige JE,Bornman PC,et al.Endoscopic man- agement of bile leaks after laparoseopic choleeystectomy[J].S Afr J Surg,2013,51(4):116-121.
  • 7Stevens JL, Laliotis A,Gould S.Hepatocolonic fistula :a rare consequence of retained gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Ann R Coil Surg Engl,2013,95 (8): 139-141.
  • 8John RR,David BE.Single-port laparoscopic surgery:an overview[J].Surg Endosc,2009,23(7):1419-1427.
  • 9Kobayashi S,Nagano H,Marubashi S,et al.A single-incision laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma:intial experience in a Japanese patient[J].Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol,2010,19(6):367-371.
  • 10Remzi FH,Kirat HT,Kaouk JH,et al.Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery[J].Colorectal Dis,2008,10(8):823-826.

引证文献12

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部