期刊文献+

Improved Reliability Analysis Method Based on the Failure Assessment Diagram 被引量:9

Improved Reliability Analysis Method Based on the Failure Assessment Diagram
下载PDF
导出
摘要 With the uncertainties related to operating conditions,in-service non-destructive testing(NDT) measurements and material properties considered in the structural integrity assessment,probabilistic analysis based on the failure assessment diagram(FAD) approach has recently become an important concern.However,the point density revealing the probabilistic distribution characteristics of the assessment points is usually ignored.To obtain more detailed and direct knowledge from the reliability analysis,an improved probabilistic fracture mechanics(PFM) assessment method is proposed.By integrating 2D kernel density estimation(KDE) technology into the traditional probabilistic assessment,the probabilistic density of the randomly distributed assessment points is visualized in the assessment diagram.Moreover,a modified interval sensitivity analysis is implemented and compared with probabilistic sensitivity analysis.The improved reliability analysis method is applied to the assessment of a high pressure pipe containing an axial internal semi-elliptical surface crack.The results indicate that these two methods can give consistent sensitivities of input parameters,but the interval sensitivity analysis is computationally more efficient.Meanwhile,the point density distribution and its contour are plotted in the FAD,thereby better revealing the characteristics of PFM assessment.This study provides a powerful tool for the reliability analysis of critical structures. With the uncertainties related to operating conditions,in-service non-destructive testing(NDT) measurements and material properties considered in the structural integrity assessment,probabilistic analysis based on the failure assessment diagram(FAD) approach has recently become an important concern.However,the point density revealing the probabilistic distribution characteristics of the assessment points is usually ignored.To obtain more detailed and direct knowledge from the reliability analysis,an improved probabilistic fracture mechanics(PFM) assessment method is proposed.By integrating 2D kernel density estimation(KDE) technology into the traditional probabilistic assessment,the probabilistic density of the randomly distributed assessment points is visualized in the assessment diagram.Moreover,a modified interval sensitivity analysis is implemented and compared with probabilistic sensitivity analysis.The improved reliability analysis method is applied to the assessment of a high pressure pipe containing an axial internal semi-elliptical surface crack.The results indicate that these two methods can give consistent sensitivities of input parameters,but the interval sensitivity analysis is computationally more efficient.Meanwhile,the point density distribution and its contour are plotted in the FAD,thereby better revealing the characteristics of PFM assessment.This study provides a powerful tool for the reliability analysis of critical structures.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2012年第4期832-837,共6页 中国机械工程学报(英文版)
基金 supported by National Department Public Benefit Research Foundation of China (Grant No. 200810411)
关键词 reliability analysis failure assessment diagram probabilistic fracture mechanics kernel density estimation sensitivity analysis reliability analysis,failure assessment diagram,probabilistic fracture mechanics,kernel density estimation,sensitivity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1British Energy. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects[S]. Gloucester, UK: British Energy Generation Ltd, 2003.
  • 2British Standard Institution. Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures[S]. London: British Standards Institution, 2005.
  • 3American Petroleum Institute. Recommended practice for fitness-for-service[S]. Washington DC: American Petroleum Institute, 2000.
  • 4CICERO S, MADRAZO V, CARRASCAL I A, et al. Assessment of notched structural components using Failure Assessment Diagrams and the Theory of Critical Distances[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2011, 78(16): 2 809-2 825.
  • 5HADJ MELlANI M, MATVIENKO Y G, PLUVINAGE G. Corrosion defect assessment on pipes using limit analysis and notch fracture mechanics[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2011, 18(1): 271-283.
  • 6KANTO Y, ONIZAWA K, MACHIDA H, et al. Recent Japanese research activities on probabilistic fracture mechanics for pressure vessel and piping of nuclear power plant[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2010,87(1): 11-16.
  • 7ROOS E, WACKENHUT G, LAMMERT R, et al. Probabilistic safety assessment of components[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2011, 88(1): 19-25.
  • 8QIAN G, NIFFENEGGER M. Probabilistic fracture assessment of piping systems based on FITNET FFS procedure[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2011, 241(3): 714--722.
  • 9JIN X, ZHONG Q P, HONG Y J. A probabilistic fracture mechanics assessment method based on the R6 procedure[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1997, 73(2): 161-163.
  • 10JinHui,WangJinnuo,WangLibin.PROBABILISTIC METHODOLOGY OF LOW CYCLE FATIGUE ANALYSIS[J].Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2003,16(4):356-358. 被引量:1

二级参考文献25

  • 1赵永翔,杨冰,孙亚芳,高庆.LZ50车轴钢的概率循环本构模型[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(9):48-53. 被引量:13
  • 2邬平波,于明,梁红琴,曾京.货车RD_2车轴应力谱研究[J].铁道机车车辆,2004,24(B12):49-52. 被引量:1
  • 3邓建辉.75kg/m热处理钢轨断裂原因分析[J].理化检验(物理分册),2005,41(4):195-198. 被引量:6
  • 4赵永翔,杨冰,彭佳纯,张卫华.铁道车辆疲劳可靠性设计Goodman-Smith图的绘制与应用[J].中国铁道科学,2005,26(6):6-12. 被引量:44
  • 5[5]Zhao Y X. A methodology for strain-based fatigue reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Saf., 2000, 70(I):205~213
  • 6[6]Wirsching P H, Tomg T Y, Martin W S. Advanced fatigue reliability analysis. Int. J. Fatigue, 1991, 13(5):389~394
  • 7[7]Bargrnann H, Rustenberg I, Devlukla J. Reliability of metal components in fatigue: a simple algorithm for the exact solution. Fatigue Fract. Eng.Mater. Struct., 1994, 17(12): 1 445~1 457
  • 8[8]Zhao J, Tang J, Wu H C. A reliability assessment method in strain-based fatigue life analysis. J. Press. Vess. Tech. ASME, 1998, 120(1): 99~104
  • 9[9]Zhao Jie, Tang Jun, Wu H C. A generalized random variable approach for strain-based fatigue reliability analysis. J. Press. Vess. Tech. ASME,2000, 122(2): 156~161
  • 10[10]Wu Y T, Wirsching P H. Advanced reliability method for fatigue analysis. J. Engng. Mech. ASCE, 1984, 110(4):536~553

共引文献4

同被引文献100

  • 1杨宏悦,吴华,欧阳立华,张建国.剪切机送料系统的可靠性分析研究[J].核标准计量与质量,2010(1):8-13. 被引量:3
  • 2贺寅彪,曲家棣,窦一康.反应堆压力容器承压热冲击分析[J].压力容器,2004,21(10):5-9. 被引量:16
  • 3苗峰显,郭志忠.灵敏度方法在电力系统分析与控制中的应用综述[J].继电器,2007,35(15):72-76. 被引量:33
  • 4李洪人,关广丰,郭洪波,丛大成,张辉,叶正茂.考虑阀口误差的阀控非对称液压缸系统建模、仿真与试验[J].机械工程学报,2007,43(9):33-39. 被引量:26
  • 5郑斌.反应堆压力容器承压热冲击分析研究[J].核动力工程,2012,33(1):1-3.
  • 6GAMBLE R, SERVER W, BISHOP B, et al. A risk-informed methodology for ASME section XI, appendix G[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2012, 134: 031002-1-11.
  • 7DICKSON T L, KIRK M T. An overview of the pressurized thermal shock re-evaluation project[C]//American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Pressure Vessels and Piping Division. ASME 2005 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, July 17-21, 2005, Denver, Colorado. New York: ASME, 2005: 347-358.
  • 8PUGH C E, BASS B R, DICKSON T L. Role of probabilistic analysis in integrity assessments of reactor pressure vessels exposed to pressurized thermal-shock conditions[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2007, 14: 501-517.
  • 9DICKSON T L, YIN S J, KIRK M T, et al. Derivation of the new pressurized thermal shock screening criteria[C]//American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Pressure Vessels and Piping Division. ASME 2011 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, July 17-21, 2011, Baltimore, Maryland. NewYork: ASME, 2011: 545-554.
  • 10BHATTACHARYA B, CHATTERJEE A, AGRAWAL G, et al. Reliability-based partial safety factors for dual performance level design of prestressed inner containment shells in Indian nuclear power plants[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2013, 256: 188-201.

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部