期刊文献+

认识情态与传信情态 被引量:5

Chinese Epistemic Modality and Evidential Modality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认识情态与传信情态都可以表达说话人对于句子命题真值的判断,都属于混合型情态。但是,二者在认知机制的模式、所编码的情态意义、说话人的确信程度、主客观性程度等诸多方面存在明显的差异:认识情态是一种对命题真值的评估机制,传信情态则是一种通过推理的手段进行的论证机制;认识情态侧重说话人对信息的态度,而传信情态则侧重信息的来源;认识情态表达说话人的确信程度,有强弱之分,而传信情态则提供信息来源,无强弱之别,因此,认识情态的主观性程度要高于传信情态的主观性程度。 Epistemic Modality and Evidential Modality can express the speakers' estimation ot the truth of the proposition, and they overlap each other. They are quite different on the mode of cognitive mechanism/ the modal meaning/the speakers' degree of commitment/the degree of subjectivity and so on. Epistemic Modality is the cognitive mechanism of evaluation about the truth of the proposition; however Evidential Modality is the cognitive mechanism of demonstration by the methods of reasoning. Epistemic Modality emphasizes particularly on the speakers' attitude toward that information; however Evidential Modality emphasizes particularly on the sources of information. The speakers' of commitment expressed by Epistemic Modality have different degrees; However Evidential Modality just provides with the sources of information, and there are no different degrees. Finally, the subjective degrees of Epistemic Modality are much higher than the subjective degrees of Evidential Modality.
作者 冯军伟
出处 《云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版)》 2012年第4期43-48,共6页 Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition)
基金 河北省高等学校科学研究基金青年项目<基于对外汉语教学的现代汉语认识情态表达研究>(S2011605) 教育部人文社科基金青年项目<基于第二语言教学的语义语法范畴研究>(08JC740027) 国家社科基金青年项目<现代汉语话题标记的功能研究>(11CYY051)
关键词 认识情态 传信情态 差异 Epistemic modality evidential modality difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1[英国]David Crystal. A dictionary of Linguistics and Phoneties[M]. Blaekwell Publishers, 1997.
  • 2戴维·克里斯特尔编.现代语言学词典(第四版)[M].沈家煊译,北京:商务印书馆,2002.
  • 3[美国]Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne. Fleischman. Mo- dality in grammar and discourse (Typological Stud- ies in Language 32 ) [ M ]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995.
  • 4[比利时] Jan Nuyts. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization [ M ]. Amsterdam: Benj amins, 2000.
  • 5[美国]Elizabeth Closs Traugott. & Richard B. Dasher. Regularity in semantic change [M]. Cam- bridge. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 6张兴.“だろう”与“だろうか”在认识情态中的地位[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2006,29(6):18-22. 被引量:3
  • 7[英国]John Lyons. Semantics (V. 2)[M]. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
  • 8李敏.现代汉语的义务情态分析[J].语言教学与研究,2010(1):52-59. 被引量:9
  • 9[英国]F. R. Palmer. Mood and Modality (second e- dition) [M]. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • 10[美国]Joan L. Bybee. Morphology[M]. Amster- dam. John Beniamins, 1985.

二级参考文献36

  • 1吕叔湘.1992b.《现代汉语指示词》,商务印书馆.
  • 2袁毓林.2003.无指代词“他”的句法语义功能-从韵律句法和焦点理论的角度看,载《语法研究和探索》(十二),商务印书馆.
  • 3Bhat, D. N. S. 1999 The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 4Chung, S. & Timberlake, A. 1985 Tense, Aspect and Mood, In: Shopen, Timothy(ed. ), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Ⅲ: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Givon, Talmy 1994 Irrealis and the Subjunctive, Studies in Language, 18 -2(265 -337).
  • 6Lyons, J. 1977 Semantics (V. 2), Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Mithun, Marianne 1995 On the Relativity of Irreality, In Bybee, Joan & Fleischman, Suzanne ( ed. ) : Modality in Grammar and Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 8Palmer, F. R. 2001 Mood and Modality (2nd edition), Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Seale, J. R. 1983 Intentionality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Verspoor, M. , Dirven, R. , Radden, G. 1998 Putting Concepts Together: Syntax, In Dirven, R, Verspoor, M. (eds.) Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. John Benjamins.

共引文献10

同被引文献98

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部