期刊文献+

彩票悖论研究的情境论趋向 被引量:1

The Situation-sensitive Trend of Study on Lottery Paradox
原文传递
导出
摘要 彩票悖论是当代逻辑哲学、科学哲学、形式知识论等领域研究工作的核心之一。对彩票悖论源发语境的考察,明确了彩票悖论是关于信念合理接受的知识论悖论。为了解决彩票悖论,哲学家们在逻辑和知识论等路径上提出了概率临界值、认识效用、融贯论和概率自毁集等诸多方案。这些方案的历史脉络表明,彩票悖论的研究趋向情境论,并在此基础上沿知识论路径提出了新的情境敏感方案。 The lottery paradox is now central to recent philosophical work in philosophy of logic,philosophy of science and formal philosophy.Examining the original contexts in which lottery paradox was found,we can point out that lottery paradox is the epistemological paradox about rational acceptance.To resolve the paradox,philosophers have proposed many solutions from the perspective of logic and epistemology.These solutions show that the study on lottery paradox tends to be situation sensitive.Finally,a new situation-sensitive solution is discussed.
作者 顿新国
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期46-49,共4页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 国家社科基金项目"归纳悖论与确证逻辑新探"(11BZX061) 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目"确证理论及其语用趋向与应用研究"(08JC720006) 江苏省社会科学基金项目"形式知识论研究"(10ZXC009)
关键词 彩票悖论 解悖方案 情境敏感 合理接受 lottery paradox; solutions; being situation-sensitive; rational acceptance
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Kyburg H. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief[ M]. Middletown : Wesleyan University Press, 1961 : 197.
  • 2凯伯格.概率,合理性和分离规则[C]//江天骥.科学哲学名著选读.武汉:湖北人民出版社,1988:338-350.
  • 3Levi I. Information and Inference [ C ]. Decision and Revi- sions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984:60 - 72.
  • 4Bonjour L. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge [ M ]. Cam- bridge : Harvard University Press, 1985:236.
  • 5Ryan S. The Epistemic Virtues of Consistency [ J ]. Synthese, 1996(109) : 130.
  • 6Douven I. A New Solution to the Paradoxes of Rational Ac- ceptability [ J ]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,2002 (53) : 391 - 410.
  • 7顿新国.归纳悖论的方法论研究探纲[J].自然辩证法通讯,2010,32(6):14-18. 被引量:2
  • 8顿新国.彩票悖论的一个强贝耶斯型解决方案[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2009,23(6):27-32. 被引量:1

二级参考文献33

  • 1Henry Kyburg. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief [ M ]. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1961 : 197-199.
  • 2G Hempel. Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation[C]. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds), Min- nesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3, Minneapolis: University of Minnersota Press, 1962:98-169.
  • 3I Levi. Information and Inference[ C], In Decisions and visions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984 :62.
  • 4M Kaplan. A Bayesian Theory of Rational Acceptance [J]. Journal of Philosophy, 1981 (78) : 309.
  • 5Lawrence Bonjour. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985: 236.
  • 6Sharon Ryan. The Epistemic Virtues of Consistency[J]. Synthese, 1996 (109): 121-141.
  • 7Dana K Nelkin. The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality[ J]. The Philosophical Review, 2000 ( 109, No. 3) : 373-409.
  • 8Igor Douven. A New Solution to the Paradoxes of Rational Acceptability [J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2002 (53) : 391-410.
  • 9G. Harman. Change in View[M]. Cambridge MA: MIT Press , 1986:41.
  • 10Jon Barwise and John Perry. Situations and Attitudes [ M]. Stanford : CSLI Publications, 1999.

共引文献1

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部