期刊文献+

丙泊酚与依托咪酯麻醉对感染性休克患者细胞免疫功能的影响 被引量:12

Effects of propofol and etomidate anesthesia on cellular immune function of septic shock patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究丙泊酚与依托咪酯对感染性休克围手术期患者免疫功能的影响。方法选择2009年3月-2010年10月在医院临床诊断为感染性休克拟行手术病灶清除的患者78例,按患者接受手术次序进行分组:单号为丙泊酚组,双号为依托咪酯组,各39例;两组分别于麻醉诱导前、术毕及术后1、3、7d分别检测CD3+、CD4+、CD8+的百分率及CD4+/CD8+比值。结果两组患者基线资料具有可比性;与麻醉前相比较,两组患者手术结束时CD3+与CD4+的水平均较麻醉前显著降低(P<0.05),其中,丙泊酚组下降更为显著(P<0.05);术后1d两组患者的CD3+与CD4+的水平均开始回升,术后7d回升到麻醉前水平;两组间比较,术毕及术后1d丙泊酚组CD3+的水平显著低于依托咪酯组(P<0.05);术毕、术后1、3d丙泊酚组CD4+的水平显著低于依托咪酯组(P<0.05);与麻醉前及依托咪酯组相比较,丙泊酚组术毕、术后1、3d患者CD4+/CD8+水平均显著降低(P<0.05),分别为(1.1±0.5)、(1.3±0.9)、(1.4±0.4)%,于术后7d恢复至麻醉前水平。结论感染性休克围手术期使用依托咪酯对患者免疫功能影响较小。 OBJECTIVE To study the influence of propofol or etomidate on cytoimmunity of septic shock patients during periperative period.METHODS A total of 78 patients with septic shock were divided into two groups,39 cases were respectively given propofol or etomidate.The percentage of CD3+,CD4+,CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ before induction of anesthesia,and 1,3 and 7 days albert and after operation were evaluated.RESULTS The baseline data were comparable;as compared with that before the anesthesia,both of the two groups’ CD3+ and CD4+ at the end of surgery significantly decreased(P〈0.05),while the propofol group decreased the most significantly(P〈0.05);CD3+ and CD4+ levels of the two groups began to rise 1 day after the operation,and returned back to the level before the anesthesia 7 days after the operation;the CD3+ level of the propofol group was significantly lower than that of the etomidate group 1 day albert and after the operation(P〈0.05);the CD4+ level of the propofol groups was significantly lower than that of the etomidate group 3 days albert and after the operation(P〈0.05);as compared with that before the anesthesia and the etomidate group,the CD4+/CD8+ of the propofol groups albert,1 day and 3 days after operations were(1.1±0.5)%,(1.3±0.9)% and(1.4±0.4)%,which were significantly decreased and restored to the level before the anesthesia 7 days after the operation.CONCLUSION The application of etomidate during perioperative period has less impact on immune function of the septic shock patients.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第13期2757-2759,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 感染性休克 麻醉 细胞免疫 丙泊酚 依托咪酯 Septic shock Anesthesia Cytoimmunity Propofol Etomidate
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Textoris J,Wiramus S,Martin C,et al.Antibiotic therapy in patients with septic shock[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2011,28(5):318-324.
  • 2Catenacci MH,King K.Severe sepsis and septic shock:im-proving outcomes in the emergency department[J].Emerg Med Clin North Am,2008,26(3):603-623.
  • 3Kawasaki T,Sata T.Perioperative innate immunity and its modulation[J].J UOEH,2011,33(2):123-137.
  • 4Griffis CA,Page G,Kremer M,et al.Implications of immune function to anesthesia care[J].AANA J,2008,76(6):449-454.
  • 5Sinha A,Shahzad K,Latif F,et al.Peripheral blood mononu-clear cell transcriptome profiles suggest T-cell immunosup-pression after uncomplicated mechanical circulatory support device surgery[J].Hum Immunol,2010,71(2):164-169.
  • 6许景艳,陈军浩,欧阳建,顾勤,刘勇,王妍.中性粒细胞CD64在成人脓毒症中的早期诊断价值[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2009,19(5):596-598. 被引量:7
  • 7Zhang T,Liang Y,Fu R,et al.Quantity and function of T cell subsets in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobin-uria[J].Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi,2010,18(3):721-725.

二级参考文献9

  • 1任成山.脓毒症的发病机制[J].中国急救医学,2005,25(10):748-750. 被引量:36
  • 2LevyMM, FinkMP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference[J]. Crit Care Med, 2003,31: 1250-1256.
  • 3Christ-CrainM, Morgenthaler NG, Struck J, et al. Mid-regional pro-ADM as a prognostic marker in sepsis:an observational study[J]. Crit Care,2005,9(6) :816-824.
  • 4de Haas M. IgG2Fc receptors and the clinical relevance of their polymorphisms[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2001,113 (20-21): 825-831.
  • 5Fossati G,Bucknall RC, Edwards SW. Fc Gamma receptors in autoimmune diseases[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2001,31 (9) : 821-831.
  • 6Wagner C, Deppisch R, Denefleh B, et al. Expression patterns of the lipopolysaccharide receptor CD14, and the FC [gamma] receptors CD16 and CD64 on polymorphonuclear neutrophils:ata from atients with evere acterial nfections and ipopolysaecharide-Exposed Cells[J]. Shock Soc,2003,19(1) : 5-12.
  • 7Bhandari V, Wang C, Rinder C, et al. Hematologic profile of sepsis in neonates: neutrophil CD6, as a diagnostic marker [J]. Pediatrics, 2008,121 (1) : 129-134.
  • 8Davis BH, Bigelow NC. Comparison of neutrophil CD64 expression, manual myeloid immaturity counts, and automated hematology analyzer flags as indicators of infection or sepsis [J]. Lab Hematol,2005,11(2) : 137-147.
  • 9Song SH, Kim HK, Park MH, etal. Neutrophil CD64 expression is associated with severity and prognosis of disseminated intravaseular coagulation[J]. Thromb Res, 2008,121 : 499-507.

共引文献6

同被引文献108

  • 1安友仲,邱海波,黄青青,康焰,管向东.中国重症加强治疗病房患者镇痛和镇静治疗指导意见(2006)[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(17):1158-1166. 被引量:243
  • 2张日风.依托咪酯对肾上腺皮质功能影响的研究.广西医科大学,2009.
  • 3Hogan BV, Peter MB, Shenoy HG, et al. Surgery induced immunosuppression[J]. Surgeon, 2011, 9(1 ) : 38-43.
  • 4Heusinkveld M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Goedemans R, et al. M2 macrophages induced by prostaglandin E2 and IL-6 from cervical carcinoma are switched to activated M1 macrophages by CD4+ Thl cells[J]. J Immunol, 2011, 187(3): 1157-1165.
  • 5Tavare AN, Perry NJ, Benzonana LL, et al. Cancer recurrence after surgery: direct and indirect effects of anesthetic agents[J].Int J Cancer, 2012, 130(6) : 1237-1250.
  • 6Mathew B, LennonFE, Siegler J, et al. Thenovelroleofthemu opioid receptorinlungcancerprogression: alaboratoryinvestigation [J]. Anesth Analg, 2010, 112(3) : 558-567.
  • 7Singleton PA, Lingen MW, Fekete JG , et al. Methylnahrexone inhibits opiate and VEGF-induced angiogenesis: role of receptor transactivation[J]. Micrivasc Res, 2006, 72(1-2) : 3-11.
  • 8Tavare AN, Perry N J, Benzonana LL, et al. Cancer recurrence after surgery: direct and indirect effects of anesthetic agents[ J ]. Int J Cancer, 2012, 130(6): 1237-1250.
  • 9Heaney A1, Buggy DJ. Can anaesthetic and analgesic techniques affect cancer recurrence or metastasis? [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2012, 109 (Suppl 1): i17-i28.
  • 10Gottschalk A, Sharma S, Ford J, et al. The role of the perioperative period in recurrence after cancer surgery [J]. Anesth Analq,2010, 110(6): 1636-1643.

引证文献12

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部