期刊文献+

我国动物致害责任免责事由之探讨 被引量:2

Research on the Liabilities Exemption for Injuries Made by Animals in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 免责事由是动物致害责任中必不可少的一部分,其关涉侵权责任制度对受害人利益保护和行为人行为自由之价值的平衡。但在学理上学者对其研究并不是很成熟,本文通过对免责事由基本原理的分析,具体探讨可作为动物致害责任免责事由的情形,以此为铺垫,对我国当前动物致害责任免责事由的规定进行评析,并进而提出应增加相关免责事由的构想。 Liabilities exemption is a necessary part of liabilities for injuries made by animals, which is related to the balance be- tween the protection to victims from tort liability system and the value of behavior' s freedom. However, scholars are not ripe in the study academically. The author analyzed the basic principle of liabilities exemption, discussed situations of liabilities exemption for injuries made by animals, evaluated the current regulations on liabilities exemption for injuries made by animals and put forward the ideas of in- creasing relative liabilities exemption.
作者 任雪原
出处 《山西警官高等专科学校学报》 2012年第3期47-50,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy
关键词 免责事由 动物致害责任 liabilities exemption liability for injuries made by animals
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1[1][加]Phlip@ H@ Osborne. The Law Of Torts[M]. Irwin Law. Tomto,2000,309.
  • 2[2][6][美]William. Animal Law in California [ J ]. Pepperdine Law Re-view. Vol, 12,1985,596.
  • 3[3][7][8][9][10]参见[英]The Animals Act 1971.s6(2),s5(2),s6(5),s5(30).
  • 4[4][澳]John G@Fleming.The Law Of torts[M].400.
  • 5[5][英]W@V@H@Rogers. Winfield And Jolowicz On Ton[M]. 15th Edition,Sween & Maxwell. London, 1998,574,575.
  • 6[11][英]W@ V@ H. Rogers. Winfield And Jolowicz On Tort [ M ]. 577.
  • 7[12][13][16][加]Phlip@ H@Oshorne. The Law Of Tons[M]. 312. 314
  • 8[14][15][17][19][参见][英]The Animals Act 1971 ,s4(1),s5(1),s5(6),s5(5).
  • 9[18]参见[美]Marsha@K@Ternus.Liability For The Escape Of Animals,Drake Law Review[J].1981,Vol.30,No.20,p266.
  • 10[20]参见(1882)10 QB,p17-20.

共引文献112

同被引文献2

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部