期刊文献+

法治二元论视角下新加坡土地征收低补偿规则研究 被引量:5

Probing into the Low Compensation Rules of Singapore Land Acquisition in the Perspective of Dualistic Theory of Rule of Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新加坡自1965年建国始以"低补偿"为显著特征的土地征收制度运行了长达四十余载,直至2007年方予重大修改。这些被新加坡国内外诸多人士谴责为"恶法"的征地补偿规则成功运行如此长时间且从未引发野蛮强拆或者被征收人(户)涉法上访、堵路、跳楼、自焚乃至暴力性质的群体性抗法等征地与拆迁乱象。以"法治二元论"视角观之,其根源于新加坡法律治理过程中所依循的泾渭分明的形式法治与实质法治二元发展路径。新加坡土地征收领域的法治实践是该国处于长期执政地位的人民行动党依法执政和全社会服从规则治理事业的缩影。新加坡法治建设模式可为中国等法治后发型国家所学习和借鉴。 Since the founding of the Republic of Singapore in 1965,the Land Acquisition Act,with the characteristics of Low Compensation,had been undergone over 40 years,till the fundamental revision of the Act in 2007.The so cursed Evil Law as the Low Compensation Rules had been surprisingly operated well enough and never confronted with judicial decision related grief reports,and other extreme demonstrations such as road-blockings,suicidal burning and collective violence.In the perspective of legal governance,the success is rooted in Singapore mode of dualistic development of Formal Rule of Law and Substantial Rule of Law,which is epitome of PAP's reign in accordance to rule of law and the respect of law of the whole society in the domain of land acquisition.Singapore experience can been drawn on by China and other countries featured by newly launched construction of rule of law.
作者 高中
机构地区 湖南大学法学院
出处 《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期50-63,191,共14页 Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究2012年规划基金项目"形式法治与实质法治二元发展路径研究:以新加坡法律治理模式为切入点"(项目编号:12YJA820017) 湖南大学"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"2011年重点项目"法治的形式与实质二元分离范式研究"的阶段性成果
关键词 新加坡 土地征收补偿 法律解释 法治二元论 依法执政 Singapore,land acquisition and compensation,legal interpretation,dualistic theory of rule of law,political reign in accordance with the rule of law
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Linda Lim. Can Money Ease Loss of Memories? [ N ]. Straits Times ( Sing. ). 06-21-2007.
  • 2Example of PAP making profits from forced land acquisitions, Posted by Singaporege 2011, 04-19-2011, http: //singaporege2011.wordpress. com.
  • 3新加坡联合早报编.李光耀40年政论选[M].北京:中国对外贸易总公司现代出版社,1994.
  • 4Bryan CHEW, Vincent HOONG, TAY Lee Koon, Manimegatai VELLASAMY. Compulsory Acquisition of Land in Singapore: A Fair Regime? [J].22 Singapore Academy of Law Journal.2010.
  • 5Jianlin Chen.Curbing Rent-Seeking and Efficiency with Broad Takings-Powers and Undercompensation: The Case of Singapore from a Givings Perspective [J]. 19 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 1, 2010.
  • 6N.Khublall.Compulsory Land Acquisition: Singapore and Malaysia [M] .2nd ed.Singapore: Butterworths Asia, 1994.
  • 7Bryan CHEW, Vincent HOONG, TAY Lee Koon, Manimegalai VELLASAMY. Compulsory Acquisition of Land in Singapore: A Fair Regime? [J] 22 Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 2010.
  • 8[英]戴雪.英宪精义[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2001..
  • 9[美]富勒.郑戈译.法律的道德性[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007.208.
  • 10陈金钊.法律人思维中的规范隐退[J].中国法学,2012(1):5-18. 被引量:113

二级参考文献17

  • 1图依布纳,矫波.现代法中的实质要素和反思要素[J].北大法律评论,1999(2):579-632. 被引量:61
  • 2夏恿.法治是什么——渊源、规诫与价值[J].中国社会科学,1999(4):117-143. 被引量:307
  • 3郑永流.法治四章[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.164-165.
  • 4张文显.法学理论前沿[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2001.
  • 5[美]理查德斯·B·斯图尔特.美国行政法的重构[M].沈岿,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002.
  • 6袁祥,王逸吟.更多协商、更少强制、更多自由--行政法学者眼中的软法[N].光明日报,2009-12-03.(9).
  • 7[美]理查德·A·波斯纳.联邦法院:挑战与改革[M].邓海平,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
  • 8胡玲玲.能动司法是实质法治的必然要求[N].江苏法制报,2010-02-04,(1).
  • 9高鸿钧.现代西方法治的冲突和整合[M]∥.高鸿钧.清华法治论衡(第1辑).北京:清华大学出版社,2000.
  • 10[古希腊]亚里士多德.政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983..

共引文献272

同被引文献44

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部