期刊文献+

对中国社会经济改革进程中收入不平等的认知:一个同期群组的分析

Income Imbalance in China's Reform:A Cohort Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不同群组在对收入不平等的态度上是否会因为个人经历不同的时代背景而产生差异?运用2005年中国综合社会调查的数据,比较四组拥有不同时代背景经历的群组,在转型期对收入不平等的看法。研究结果显示,年龄较老的群组对于收入不平等持有更多批评而年轻群组则对收入不平等有着更为宽容的态度,考虑不同群组中的不同自身利益之后并不能大幅度降低人们对收入不平等的态度上的差异。研究进一步表明,更重要的中介因素是人们对社会公正的信念。 Do attitudes differ towards income imbalance from cohort to cohort? Based on the data collected from investigations in the four different cohorts, the paper posits that the older people are more critical of income imbalance while the younger people are more tolerant. The study also shows that more important than income imbalance is the concept of social justice.
作者 周亚平
出处 《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期92-99,共8页 Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金(11CSH022) Canada International Development Research Center-Global Partners Ⅱ Fund"Regional Perceptions of Gendered Employment Discrimination and Income Inequities in Rural China" 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"社会分层与再分配偏好研究"(12LZUJBWYB046)
关键词 收入不平等 社会公正 同期群 中国 income imbalance social justice cohort China
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Kluegel J R, Mason D S. Fairness Matters: Social Justice and Political Legitimacy in Post~Communist Europe[J]. Europe-Asia Studies, 2004(6): 813-834.
  • 2Inequality. Commentary: The First Step Towards Reduction in Inequality[J/OL]. [2005-09-06]. paowang.com/blog /langege/archives/007294.html.
  • 3Pei M X. The Dark Side of China's Rise[J]. Foreign Policy, 2006(March/April): 32-40.
  • 4怀默霆.中国民众如何看待当前的社会不平等[J].社会学研究,2009(1):96-120. 被引量:214
  • 5王天夫,王丰.中国城市收入分配中的集团因素:1986-1995[J].社会学研究,2005(3):156-181. 被引量:60
  • 6Whyte M K, Han C. Popular Attitudes Toward Income Disparity: Beijing and Warsaw Compared[J]. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2008(13): 29-51.
  • 7Xie Y. Otis Dudley Duncan's Legacy: The Demographic Approach to Quantitative Reasoning in Social Science[J]. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 2007(2): 141-156.
  • 8Alwin D F, McCammon R J. Generations, Cohorts, and Social Change[G]//Mortimer J T, Shanahan M J. Hand- book of the Life Course. Boston: MA and Dordrecht; Kluwer, 2003: 23-50.
  • 9Hadler M. Why Do People Accept Different Income Ratios? A Multi-level Comparison of Thirty Countries[J]. Acta Sociologica, 2005(2): 131-154.
  • 10Mau S. Ideologischer Konsens und Dissens im Wohlfahrtsstaat[J]. Soziale Welt, 1997(47): 17-38.

二级参考文献79

  • 1朱庆芳.2006,《社会经济和谐度指标体系综合评价和分析》.汝信,陆学艺,李培林主编.《2006年:中国社会形势分析与预测》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,
  • 2Bernstein, Thomas & Xiaobo Lu 2003, Taxation without Representation in Contemporary Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Chung, Jae Ho, Hongyi Lai & Ming Xia 2006, “Mounting Challenges to Governance in China: Surveying Collective Protestors, Religious Sects, and Criminal Organizations.” The China Journal 56.
  • 4The Economist 2006," How the Other 800m Live." March 22.
  • 5Han, Chunping 2007, Rural-Urban Cleavages in Perceptions of Inequality in Contemporary China. Unpubhshed doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Harvard University.
  • 6Khan, Azizur & Cad Riskin 2005, "China' s Household Income Distribution, 1995 and 2002." The China Quarterly 182.
  • 7Kluegel, James 1988, "Economic Problems and Socioeconomic Beliefs and Attitudes." Research on Social Stratification and Mobility 7.
  • 8Kluegel, James & Eliot Smith 1986, Beliefs about Inequality: Americans' Views of What Is and What Ought to Be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • 9Kluegel, James, David Mason & Bernd Wegener(eds. ) 1995,Social Justice and Political Change. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • 10Kreidl, Martin 2000, "Perceptions of Poverty and Wealth in Western and Post-Communist Countries. " Social Justice Research 13.

共引文献289

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部