期刊文献+

土地市场中开发商行贿表征的量化分析——基于Logistic模型及Moran指数的应用 被引量:4

Quantitative Analysis on the Bribery Behaviors of the Developers in Land Market:Based on the Application of Logistic Model and Moran Index
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究目的:以武汉、南京、广州三市为例,量化分析土地市场中开发商行贿的表征。研究方法:Logistic模型及Moran指数。研究结果:(1)开发商行贿在"供给"和"需求"两种力量的推动下进行;(2)开发商行贿具有区域集聚性和区域差异性。研究结论:(1)在宏观因素和微观因素的影响下,开发商行贿是出于对制度环境和企业实力通盘考虑后作出的理性选择,具有不得已而为之的被动性;(2)开发商行贿有一定的空间相关性,且高-高关联的特征最为显著。 The purpose of this study is to conduct a quantitative analysis on the bribery behaviors of the developers in land market, taking Wuhan, Nanjing, and Guangzhou as the cases. Methods of logistic model and moran index are employed. The resuhs show that 1 ) developers' bribery is driven by two forces i.e., the "supply" and "demand" forces;2) there are regional agglomeration and regional difference in developers'bribery. The research concludes that 1 )regarding the impact of macro and micro factors the bribery behaviors of the developers is a rational choice because developers have taken into account the overall condition based on the system environment and business strength, i.e., a passive behaviors; 2) bribery behaviors of the developers are spatially correlated, and the high-high correlation is most significant.
出处 《中国土地科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期26-34,共9页 China Land Science
基金 土地市场中开发商行贿的表征 演变及损害研究(11CGL084)
关键词 土地市场 开发商 行贿表征 量化分析 land market developer bribery behavior quantitative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1新华社连发六篇评论文章,剑指房地产市场症结[EB/0L].http://www.china-zhongfa.com/detail.php?iParentID-1/ilnfoID-140.hlml.
  • 2Michael S. Pritchard. Bribery: The Concept[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1998, (4): 281 - 286.
  • 3Derek J. Clark, Christian Riis. Allocation Efficiency in a Competitive Bribery Game[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2000,(42): 109- 124.
  • 4Klaus Abbinc, Bernd Irlenbusch, Eike Renner. An Experimental Bribery Game[ J ]. The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization. 2002,18(2) : 428 - 454.
  • 5Amitrajeet A. Batabyal and Hamid Beladi. Bribery and Favoritism in Queuing Models of Rationed Resource Allocation[J ]. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2008,20( 3 ) : 329 - 338.
  • 6张心向.社会组织商业贿赂行为的特点、原因及其控制——以越轨社会学理论为分析视角[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(5):17-25. 被引量:7
  • 7谢平,陆磊.利益共同体的胁迫与共谋行为:论金融监管腐败的一般特征与部门特征[J].金融研究,2003(7):1-15. 被引量:62
  • 8李捷瑜,黄宇丰.转型经济中的贿赂与企业增长[J].经济学(季刊),2010,9(3):1467-1484. 被引量:52
  • 9Yanjing Chen, Mahmut Yasar, Roderick M. Rejesus. Factors Influencing the Incidence of Bribery Payouts by Firms: A Cross-Country Analysis[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, (77): 231 - 244.
  • 10Greene, W. Econometric Analysis[ M ]. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 2003.

二级参考文献54

  • 1孙刚,陆铭,张吉鹏.反腐败、市场建设与经济增长[J].经济学(季刊),2005,4(B10):1-22. 被引量:53
  • 2Tanzi V.《世界范围内的腐败:原因、后果、范围和医治对策》[A].胡鞍钢主编.《中国:挑战腐败》[C].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1999.208—41.
  • 3Acemoglu, D., and S. Johnson, " Unbundling Institutions", NBER Working Paper No. 9934, 2903.
  • 4Bardhan, P. , "Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues", Journal of Economic Litera ture, 1997, 35(3), 1320-1346.
  • 5Bailey, D. , "The Effects of Corruption in a Developing Nation", Western Political Quarterly, 1966, 19(4), 719-732.
  • 6Beck, P. , and M. Maher, "A Comparison of Bribery and Bidding in Thin Markets", Economics Letters, 1986, 20(1), 1-5.
  • 7Cai, H. , H. Fang, and L. Xu, "Eat, Drink, Firms and Government: An Investigation of Corrup tion from Entertainment Expenditures of Chinese Firms", Working Paper, 2008.
  • 8Dreher, A. , and M. Gassebner, "Greasing the Wheels of Entrepreneurship? Impact of Regulations and Corruption on Firm Entry", KOF Working Paper No. 166, 2007.
  • 9EBRD, Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS). New York: World Bank, 2005.
  • 10Fisman, R, and J. Svensson, "Are Corruption and Taxation Really Harmful to Growth? Firm Level Evidence", Journal of Development Economics, 2007, 83(1), 63-75.

共引文献114

同被引文献249

引证文献4

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部