期刊文献+

应对气候变化措施同WTO原则的冲突——理论与实证分析 被引量:2

Conflicts between Trade-related Climatic Measures and the WTO Principle——A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与贸易有关的环境措施在GATT/WTO法律层面持续引起学者们对贸易与环境问题的激烈争论。而气候变化博弈中,WTO成员方采取应对气候变化的单边措施,可能违反了WTO的非歧视原则和其他若干规则。对从未做出碳减排承诺的国家进口的产品征收反补贴税可能违反SCM协定,TRIPs协定很难成功适用于气候友好型技术的转让与应用之中,这都是气候变化下WTO争端问题凸显的主因。本文通过探讨碳关税等应对气候变化措施与WTO的一致性,对GATT/WTO关于贸易与环境的争端解决案例进行解读,探寻气候变化下WTO争端解决的未来走向,对我国频发的贸易摩擦提出应对策略。 Trade-related environmental measures continue to give rise to heated debate on issue of trade vs environment at the law level of GATT /WTO.In the game of climate change,WTO members may adopt unilateral measures to deal with climate change,in violation of WTO Principle of Non-discrimination and a number of rules.For instance,it may be violating the SCM Agreement to levy compensating duties on products imported from those members of WTO never making carbon emission reduction commitments.It is difficult for the TRIPs agreement to be applied in the transfer and application of climate-friendly technology.In addition,climate change issues highlight the WTO dispute settlement.By probing the consistency between climate change-related measures such as carbon-emission on the one hand tariff and the WTO on the other hand,this paper is intended for expounding the case study of trade and environment dispute settlement concerning climate change under GATT/WTO,exploring the future orientation of WTO dispute settlement under the climate change and propoing counter-measures against China’s frequent trade clashes.
作者 郑玲丽
机构地区 南京师范大学
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 2012年第6期8-19,共12页 Pacific Journal
基金 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目"A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions"(PAPD)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 气候变化 应对措施 WTO原则 冲突 climate change; counter-measures; WTO Principle; conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas e- mission allowanee trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC.
  • 2Domau, R. ," The emission trading scheme of the European Union" ,in D. Freestone,C. Streek(eds. ) ,Legal Aspects of Implemen- ting The Kyoto Protocol Mechanisms: Making Kyoto Work, 2005,.
  • 3Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament.
  • 4Directive 2008/101/EC.
  • 5John C. Dembach and Seema Kakade,"Climate Change Law: An Introduction", Energy Bar Association Energy Law Journal, 2008.
  • 6邓梁春.美国气候变化相关立法进展及其对中国的启示[J].世界环境,2008(2):82-85. 被引量:10
  • 7H.R. 2454 the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES) [ EB/OL].
  • 8张向晨.碳关税是否符合WTO规则?[J].WTO经济导刊,2009(12):87-88. 被引量:13
  • 9李晓玲,陈雨松.“碳关税”与WTO规则相符性研究[J].国际经济合作,2010(3):77-81. 被引量:61
  • 10the Report of the Appellate Body, United States - Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, WT/DS2/AB/R.

二级参考文献166

  • 1曾令良,陈卫东.论WTO一般例外条款(GATT第20条)与我国应有的对策[J].法学论坛,2001,16(4):32-49. 被引量:50
  • 2周泳.试论GATT/WTO法律制度和环境保护[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),1998(3):58-63. 被引量:20
  • 3陈峰.国际贸易中的“技术壁垒”及我国的法律对策[J].社会科学,1997(12):41-44. 被引量:7
  • 4黄辉.影响国际环境保护和WTO规则关系的PPMS标准[J].亚太经济,2006(1):25-28. 被引量:5
  • 5P.-D. Cameron, The Kyoto protocol : past, present and future , in P.-D. Cameron and D. Zillman (eds.), Kyoto : from principles to practice, 2001, p.3-23.
  • 6R. Wolfrum et J. Freidrich, The Framework convention on climate change and the Kyoto protocol , in U. Beyerlin, P.-T. Stoll & R. Wolfrum (eds.), Ensuring compliance with muhilateral environmental agreements : a dialogue between practitioners and academia, 2006, p.53-68.
  • 7J.-M. Arbour et S. Lavallee, Droit international de l'environnement, 2006, Ch.5, les changements climatiques , p.229-277.
  • 8A. M. Chancosa, L'utilisation d'instruments economiques dans la gestion internationale du changement climatique global , in M'. Bothe et P. H. Sand (dir.), La politique de l'environnement : de la reglementation aux instruments economiques, 2003, p.499-528.
  • 9Th. Heeler, Climate change: designing an effective response , in E. Zedillo (ed.), Global warming: looking beyond Kyoto, 2008, p.115-144.
  • 10Supra note 4, p.16-17.

共引文献114

同被引文献56

  • 1《京都议定书》第2条.
  • 2[美]斯蒂格利茨.《经济学》[M].中国人民大学出版社,1997..
  • 3《澳大利亚通过废除碳税法案》,http://news.xinhuanet.corn/world/2014-07/17/e一1111672993.htm,2014年7月17日.
  • 4See UN, Working Towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy : A United Nations System - wide Perspective, UN ,2011, p. 133.
  • 5See WTO and UNEP, Trade and Climate Change, WTO ,2009, pp. 98 - 103.
  • 6See Joshua Elliott, Unilateral Carbon Taxes, Border Tax Adjustments and Carbon Leakage, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, Vol. 14,2013, p. 207.
  • 7Christine Kaufmann, Carbon - related Border Tax Adjustment : Mitigating Climate Change or Restricting International Trade?, World Trade Re- view, Vol. 10, No. d,2011, p. 497.
  • 8SeeCase C - 366/10, Air Transport Association of America, American Airlines, Inc. , Continental Airlines, Inc. , United Airlines, Inc. v. The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, OJ( 2010 )C260/9, Oct. 6,2011, paras. 214 and 216, http ://curia. europa, eu/,last visit on October 5,2014.
  • 9See OECD, Economic/Fiscal Instruments : Taxation( I. E. Carbon/Energy), OECD, 1997.
  • 10See Paul Demaret & Paul Stewardson, Border Tax Adjustments Under GATY and EC Law and General Implications for Environmental Ta- xes, Journal of World Trade, August 1994, p. 5.

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部