以欺骗手段骗(窃)取财物的定性分析

Analysis of cheating (stealing) the property by deception means

盗窃罪与诈骗罪的主要区别在客观方面,盗窃罪的被告人违背被害人的意愿剥夺被害人对财物的占有而取得财物。而诈骗罪的被告人以欺诈的手段使受骗人产生错误认识,进而基于错误认识自愿把财物处分(交付)给被告人。所以在一般情况下,两罪是容易区分的,但在被告人使用欺骗手段骗(窃)取受骗人财物的情形下,二者容易混淆。作者试图通过具体案例从欺骗手段不是诈骗罪的唯一特质、"自愿"处分(交付)行为的含义、秘密窃取并非盗窃罪唯一的手段、从罪刑相适应来考量此种犯罪行为应受的刑罚等四个方面来具体分析以欺骗手段骗(窃)取财物的定性,从而进一步厘清盗窃罪与诈骗罪的区别所在。

The main difference between the crime of theft and fraud is the objective aspect. The theft defendant obtains property against the wishes of the victim to deprive the property possession. The defraud defendant fraudulently make the victim have the wrong understanding and voluntarily dispose （deliver） the property to the defendant. Under normal circum- stances, the two crimes are easy to distinguish, but when the defendant uses the deception means to cheat （steal） the property, the two are easy to confuse. The author attempts to analyze the nature of using deception means to cheat （steal） the property though the specific cases from the 4 aspects, such as the deception is not the unique characteristics of defraud, the meaning of the behavior of ＂voluntary＂ sanction （delivery）, secretly steal is not the only means of theft and the adaptation of crime decides the punishment, in order to further clarify the difference between theft and defraud.