摘要
目的比较超声雾化吸入方法和氧驱动雾化吸入方法在提高脑卒中并发肺部感染患者氧饱和度(SaO2)中的作用效果。方法选择62例脑卒中并发肺部感染患者,按入院确诊先后顺序分为观察组和对照组,每组各31例,分别采用超声雾化吸入方法和氧驱动雾化吸入方法。比较雾化吸入前后两组患者SaO2的差异。结果雾化吸入治疗后观察组患者SaO2高于对照组,两组比较,P<0.01,差异具有统计学意义。结论采用氧驱动雾化吸入可降低脑卒中并发肺部感染患者耗氧量,提高SaO2。
Objective To compare the effects of ultrasonic atomizing inhalation and oxygen atomizing inhalation on SaO2 saturation of patients with stroke combined with pulmonary infections. Methods 62 patients with stroke combined with pulmonary infections were equally randomized into the observation group and the control group, which were managed with oxygen atomizing inhalation and ultrasonic atomizing inhalation, respectively. The two groups were compared in respect of SaO2. Result The mean level of SaO2 in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Oxygen atomizing inhalation is more effective both in the reduction of oxygen consumption in the patients with stroke combined with pulmonary infections and in the increase of SaO2.
出处
《现代临床护理》
2012年第6期30-31,共2页
Modern Clinical Nursing
关键词
脑卒中
肺部感染
雾化吸入
氧饱和度
stroke
pulmonary infection
atomizing inhalation
oxygen saturation