医疗过错鉴定规则体系研究

Study of Systematic Rules of Medical Fault Appraisement

当前对医疗过错认定的原则讨论和研究比较多,也比较明确,但是医疗过错认定的规则却缺乏,且由于医疗过错鉴定规则的缺位,导致无论是医学会的医疗鉴定,还是法医开展的医疗过错司法鉴定,都处于一种混沌不清的状态,由此也导致多次鉴定且结论各异的现象。构建科学合理的我国的医疗过错鉴定规则体系乃当务之急。我国的医疗过错鉴定规则体系包括医疗过错认定的一般规则、医疗过错认定的特殊规则和医疗过错认定的排除规则三部分。医疗过错鉴定规则体系需要不断在实践中总结、检验、完善和扩展。

Presently there are so many discussions and studies on the principle of medical fault appraisement, but the studies on systematic rules of medical fault appraisement are in quite short. Such lack leads to many re-identifications and conclusions different from each other for the same case. Either the medical appraisement made by a medical association or the medical fault appraisement made by a forensic is quite confusing, the . Therefore, in order to establish a rational system of rules of medical fault appraisement is very imperative. The systematic rules of medical fault appraisement should include three parts： general rules of medical fault appraisement, special rules of medical fault appraisement and exclusionary rules of medical fault appraisement. The systematic rules of medical fault appraisement need to be constantly summarized, examined, improved and expanded in practice.