大学生的性别角色特征与就业焦虑的关系研究

College Students＇ Gender Role Characteristics and Employment Anxiety Study of the Relationship

目的探讨大学生的性别角色特征与就业焦虑的关系。方法随机抽取徐州三所高校的应届本科毕业生600名，性别角色特征和就业焦虑分别采用明尼苏达多相人格测定（MMPI）中的量表5Mf值和状态焦虑问卷（s—AI）。结果状态焦虑分数与常模（45．31±1199）比较，均高于全国大学生常模，组1（Mf值〉70分）和组4（Mf值≤40分）的状态焦虑分数与常模比较差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。组4（Mf值〉70分）焦虑水平最高，其次是组1（Mf值≤40分），再次是组2（Mf值〉40分≤60分），最低的是组3（Mf值〉60分≤70分）。男女之间，不同专业之间，城乡之间差异均无统计学意义。组2（Mf值〉40分≤60分）、组3（Mf值〉60分≤70分）与组4（Mf值〉70分）的状态焦虑分数差异显著，其余各组间状态焦虑分数无显著差异。结论不N的性别角色特征状态焦虑水平不同。

Objective To explore the relationship between gender role characteristics and employment anxiety in college students.Methods a random sample of 600 fresh graduates of the three universities in Xuzhou,Gender role characteristics and Employment anxiety using Minnesota Muhiphasic Personality Inventory （ MMPI ） determination in the scale of 5Mf value and State Anxiety Inventory （ S-AI ）.Results： Results the state anxiety scores and nomls （45.31 ± 11.99） comparison, are higher than the national college students norms, group 1 （Mf value 〉 70 points） and group 4 （Mr value ≤ 40 points） state of anxiety scores and norms is a statistically significant difference （P 〈 0.01）.Group 4 （Mr value 〉 70 points） anxiety level is the highest, followed by group l （Mf value ≤40 points）, once again, is in group 2 （Mr value 〉 40 points ≤60 points）, is the lowest group 3 （Mf value 〉 60 points ≤ 70 points）.Between men and women, between differences specialties, urban and rural between differences were not statistically significant.Group 2 （ Mf value 〉 40 points ≤ 60 points ）, group 3 （ Mf value 〉 60 points≤ 70 points） and group 4 （ Mf value〉 70 points） state anxiety scores showed significant differences among groups, the remaining state anxiety scores showed no significant difference.Conclusion Different gender role features state anxiety level is different.