摘要
目的探讨乙肝表面大蛋白(large HBV surface protein,LHBs)在慢性乙肝患者中检测的临床价值。方法收集2011年6月~9月期间武汉大学人民医院220例慢性乙肝患者的血液标本,同时检测血清LHBs,Pre—S1,HBsAg以及血浆HB、LDNA,并对各指标进行比较。结果220例慢性乙肝患者中,HBsAg检测结果阳性率为100%,HBV-DNA阳性率为64.5%,LHBs和Pre-S1阳性率分别为82.7%和76.4%,其一致性为90.0%;LHBs阳性率明显高于Pre-S1(χ^2=7.68,P〈0.05);HBV-DNA阳性患者中LHBs和PreS1阳性率分别为97.4%和89.7%,一致性为92.3%,LHBs阳性率明显高于Pre-S1(χ^2=4.17,P〈0.05);HBV-DNA阴性患者中LHBs和PreS1阳性率分别为74.6%和69.0%,一致性为88.7%,其阳性率差异无统计学意义(r=3.06,P〉0.05)。结论LHBs与Pre-S1均是较好的HBV感染治疗监测指标,LHBs性能优于Pre-S1,可能替代HBV-DNA和Pre-S1作为慢性乙肝治疗监测的指标。
Objective To explore the value of detecting large hepatitis B surface protein, (LHBs) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Methods Collected blood samples of 220 CHB patients from June to July 2011 in Renmin Hspital of Wuhan University, detected and compared the serum LHBs,Pre-S1, HBsAg and plasma HBV-DNA. Results Of all the 220 CHB patients,the positive rate of HBsAg was 100%,the positive rate of HBV-DNA was 64. 5 %,the positive of LHBs and Pre-S1 was 82.7% and 76.4% ,respectivly. The concordance rate was 90% ,and the positive rate of LHBs was distinct high er than Pre-S1(χ^2=7.68,P〈0. 05). The positive of LHBs and Pre-S1 was 9?. 4% and 89. 7%, in HBV-DNA positive CHB patients, respectivly. The concordance rate was 92.3 %, and the positive rate of LHBs was distincthigher than Pre-S1 (χ^2 = 4.17, P〈0.05). The positive of LHBs and Pre-S1 was 74.6 % and 69.07 % in HBV-DNA negative CHB patients, respectivly. The concordance rate was 88. 7%, and there was no significant difference between the positive rate (χ^2 = 3. 06, P〈 0.05). Conclusion LHBs and Pre-S1 are both good index for monitoring of therapy in CHB, hut LHBs maybe better,and LHBs maybe a good substitute for HBV-DNA and Pre-S1 in monitoring CHB treatment.
出处
《现代检验医学杂志》
CAS
2012年第3期141-143,共3页
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词
乙肝外膜大蛋白
前S1
慢性乙型肝炎患者
large hepatitis B surface (LHBs)
Pre-S1
chronic hepatitis B (CHB)