期刊文献+

美国死刑量刑程序的历史考察 被引量:4

A Historical Review on American Sentencing Procedure for the Death Penalty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国死刑量刑程序经历了一个正当化的历史过程,早期的陪审团废法现象催生了死刑陪审团制度,死刑陪审团制度的建立又引发了死刑案件审判的两分式改革并使死刑量刑程序得以独立,特殊的"凌驾陪审团"规则体现出美国司法界力图保持死刑裁量中职业法官与平民陪审团间的权力制衡。 American sentencing procedure for death penalty went through a historical due process, in which the phenomenon of jury nullification in early stage brought about capital jury system, resulting in the capital trial bifurcation reform and the independence of sentencing procedure for death penalty. The special rule of "jury over- ride" reflects that the American judiciary seeks to keep a balance of power between judges and juries in capital discretion.
作者 康黎
出处 《北方法学》 CSSCI 2012年第4期76-81,共6页 Northern Legal Science
基金 作者主持的四川省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划2011年度青年项目"中国量刑程序改革实证研究"(项目编号SC11C007)的阶段性成果
关键词 死刑量刑程序 死刑陪审团 独立量刑程序 凌驾陪审团规则 sentencing procedure for death penalty capital jury independent sentencing procedure rule of jury override
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1See Woodson et al. v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, (1976) ,p. 289.
  • 2See Woodson et al. v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, (1976) ,p. 290-291.
  • 3McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183(1971) ,p. 199.
  • 4See Woodson et al. v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, (1976) ,p. 291.
  • 5See Winston v. Unit-ed States, 172 U. S. 303 (1899).
  • 6See Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584(2002) ,p. 608,n. 6.
  • 7See Jeffrey Abramson,Death -is -Different Jurisprudence and the Role of the Capital Jury,2 Ohio St. J. C rim. L. 117 (2004), p. 149.
  • 8See Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584(2002) ,pp. 614-615 .
  • 9See Bonner & Fessenden ,Absence of Executions . A Special Report, States With No Death Penalty Share Lower Homicide Rates, N. Y. Times, Sept. 22, 2000, p. A1.
  • 10See Sorensen & Pilgrim,An Actuarial Risk Assessment of Violence Posed by Capital Murder Defendants ,90 J. Crim. L. & C. 1251 (2000) , p. 1256.

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部