摘要
目的比较持续和间断2种肠内营养方法对重型颅脑损伤患者的效果。方法将65例重型颅脑损伤患者随机分为对照组30例和实验组35例,分别采用间断和持续2种不同的肠内营养方法,观察并比较2组的不良反应和效果。结果采用持续肠内营养的实验组患者不良反应明显轻于采用间断肠内营养的对照组患者。2组治疗总有效率比较差异有统计学意义。结论持续肠内营养方法能有效地减少并发症的发生,能够达到满意的肠内营养疗效,且疗效优于间断肠内营养方法。
Objective To compare continuous and discontinuous enteral nutrition methods in patients with severe craniocerebral injury. Methods Sixty-five patients with severe craniocerebral injury were divided into the control group(30 cases)and the experimental group(35 cases), they each adopted discontinuous and continuous enteral nutrition methods. The adverse reaction and the effect were observed in two groups. Results The adverse reaction of the experimental group adopting continuous enteral nutrition method was obviously lighter than that of the control group. And there was distinct difference in the total rate of effectiveness between two groups. Conclusions Continuous enteral nutrition method can effectively reduce the complication and reach satisfying effect. Its effect is better than the discontinuous enteral nutrition method.
出处
《中国实用护理杂志》
北大核心
2012年第23期17-18,共2页
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词
持续肠内营养
重度颅脑损伤
不良反应
Continuous enteral nutrition
Severe eraniocerebral injury
Adverse reaction